Lesson Two very different approaches to one word problem

Algebra ->  Matrices-and-determiminant -> Lesson Two very different approaches to one word problem      Log On


   


This Lesson (Two very different approaches to one word problem) was created by by ikleyn(52754) About Me : View Source, Show
About ikleyn:

Two very different approaches to one word problem


Problem 1

Four friends,  Aisha,  Ben,  Cathy,  and  Daniel shared lunch equally.
Aisha paid  3/5  of the total amount  Ben and  Cathy paid.
Cathy paid  $10  more than  Ben.
Daniel repaid  $24.00  to  Aisha and some money to  Ben and  Cathy.
How much did  Daniel repaid to  Ben and how much to  Cathy?

Solution

It is clear that the major task in solution to this problem is to make setup.

I will make setup in several steps. 


       At step 1, I introduce variables in general form.


We have a network (like a circuit). You can imagine it as a graph with vertices (nodes) A, B, C and D and edges, 
connecting the nodes. The nodes represent the people; the edges represent cash flows between people.

Aisha (node A) pays A dollars to the restaurant; Ben    (node B) pays B dollars to the restaurant;
Cathy (node C) pays C dollars to the restaurant; Daniel (node D) pays D dollars to the restaurant.

Edge Ab represents cash flow from A to B; edge Ac represents cash flow from A to C; 
. . . and so on . . .                     edge Dc represents cash flow from D to C.

There is no cash flow from A to A; no cash flow from B to B; . . . no cash flow from D to D.

So, there are 3*4 = 12 edges Ab, Ac, . . . , Dc. 


       At step 2, I will give the values to some variables, based on given data.


A,   Ab=0,  Ac=0, Ad=0                               
B,   Ba=0,  Bc=0, Bd=0                               
C,   Ca=0,  Cb=0, Cd=0                               
D=0, Da=24, Db,   Dc                                 


As you see from this table, many variables are 0 (zero). Non-zero values are A, B, C, Da=24, Db and Dc.
My next task is to write equations for non-zero unknowns.


       At step 3, I will write equations for non-zero variables


    A = 0.6B + 0.6C  (1)     A - 24 = x             (4)   part for A

                             B - Db = x             (5)   part for B

    C = B + 10       (2)     C - Dc = x             (6)   part for C

    Da = 24          (3)     24 + Db + Dc = x       (7)   part for D


Equations follow to given information LITERALLY, so I will not explain their origin and meaning.

Here x is the amount representing the PART of everyone.
According to the problem, this part is the same for all 4 participants.
As you see, there are 7 unknown and 7 independent equations - so, there is a hope that the problem is solvable to the end.


These equations, written in one column, are presented below one more time. 
Equation (3) is excluded, since it is just used in (7).

    A = 0.6B + 0.6C          (8)

    A - 24 = x               (9)

    B - Db = x              (10)

    C = B + 10              (11)

    C - Dc = x              (12)

    24 + Db + Dc = x        (13)


So, there are 6 equations for 6 unknowns.
The unknown A can be easily excluded together with equation (8), by replacing A = 0.6B + 0.6C in equation (9).
Thus we arrive to 5 equations in 5 unknowns


0.6B + 0.6C - 24 = x        (14)

B - Db = x                  (15)

C = B + 10                  (16)

C - Dc = x                  (17)       

24 + Db + Dc = x            (18)               



Now I rewrite these equations in canonical form of a system of linear equations

                   
    0.6B + 0.6C             - x =  24    (19)

    B            - dB       - x =   0    (20)

    B    -    C                 = -10    (21)

              C -        dC - x =   0    (22)

                   dB  + dC - x = -24    (23)


At this point, my setup is complete.
Probably, this system can be solved manually, step by step.
But I decided do not spend my time for technical exercises and used an online solver
http://www.math.odu.edu/~bogacki/cgi-bin/lat.cgi


Below are the numbers from this online solver


B	=	55
C	=	65
Db	=	 7
Dc	=	17
x	=	48


The ANSWER  to the problem's question is: Daniel repaid $7 to Ben (Db=7) and $17 to Cathy (Dc=17).

You may check, that the obtained numbers satisfy the problem's conditions and equations (19) - (23).
This check is easy straightforward task, so I leave it to you.

This problem and this solution seems very educative to me, since they
represent new type of thinking, which I never saw before in school Math problems.


        Below is other, very different solution, which reduces
        the problem to one single equation for one unknown.


Let x dollars be the amount Ben paid.
Then (x+10) dollars is the amount Cathy paid.

The amount Alisha paid was 3/5 of the total that Ben and Cathy paid:

    %283%2F5%29%28x%2Bx%2B10%29+=+%286%2F5%29x%2B6


So the total amount spent was

    x+%2B+x%2B10+%2B+%286%2F5%29x%2B6+=+%2816%2F5%29x%2B16


Daniel repaid $24 to Alisha, so Alisha's equal share was %286%2F5%29x%2B6+-+24+=+%286%2F5%29x-18.


Since Alisha's share was %2816%2F5%29x-18, the total spent was

    4%28%286%2F5%29x-18%29+=+%2824%2F5%29x-72.


The two expressions for the total amount spent must be equal:

    %2816%2F5%29x%2B16=%2824%2F5%29x-72

    88=%288%2F5%29x

    x=55


Results so far....

Ben    spent x = $55;
Cathy  spent x+10 = $65;
Alisha spent (6/5)x+6 = $66+$6 = $72.


The total amount spent was $55+$65+$72 = $192.
So, the equal shares were $192/4 = $48.

Daniel repaid $24 to Alisha, making Alisha's share correct: $72-$24 = $48
Since the equal shares were $48 each, and since Daniel repaid $24 to Alisha, the total amount he repaid 
to Ben and Cathy together was $48-$24 = $24.


If we want to find the amounts repaid to Ben and Cathy separately, then we need to divide the $24 Daniel repaid 
to Ben and Cathy into two parts with Cathy's part being $10 more than Ben's.  That leads to

ANSWER.  Daniel repaid $17 to Cathy and $7 to Ben.


My lessons in this site on determinants of  3x3-matrices and the Cramer's rule for solving systems of linear equations in three unknowns are
    - Determinant of a 3x3 matrix
    - Co-factoring the determinant of a 3x3 matrix
    - HOW TO solve system of linear equations in three unknowns using determinant (Cramer's rule)
    - Solving systems of linear equations in three unknowns using determinant (Cramer's rule)
    - Solving word problems by reducing to systems of linear equations in three unknowns
    - The tricks to solve some word problems with three and more unknowns using mental math
    - Solving systems of non-linear equations in three unknowns using Cramer's rule
    - Sometime two equations are enough to find three unknowns by an UNIQUE way
    - Solving word problems in three unknowns by the backward method
    - Solving system of linear equation in 17 unknowns
    - Solving system of linear equation in 19 unknowns
    - OVERVIEW of LESSONS on determinants of 3x3-matrices and Cramer's rule for systems in 3 unknowns

My other lessons in this site on solving systems of linear equations in three unknowns are
    - Solving systems of linear equations in 3 unknowns by the Substitution method,
    - BRIEFLY on solving systems of linear equations in 3 unknowns by the Substitution method,
    - Solving systems of linear equations in 3 unknowns by the Elimination method  and
    - BRIEFLY on solving systems of linear equations in 3 unknowns by the Elimination method

Use this file/link  ALGEBRA-II - YOUR ONLINE TEXTBOOK  to navigate over all topics and lessons of the online textbook  ALGEBRA-II.


This lesson has been accessed 685 times.