Question 710955: Prove (a+b+c)(ab+ac+bc)>= 9abc where a,b,c are positive.
I'm lost as to where to begin this proof
Answer by Edwin McCravy(20056) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Prove (a+b+c)(ab+ac+bc) ≧ 9abc where a,b,c are positive.
The inequality is symmetric in a,b, and c, so
without loss of generality, we can suppose a≦b≦c
Then there exist non-negative numbers p, q, such that
b = a+p and c = a+p+q
Substitute those in the left side of the inequality:
[a+(a+p)+(a+p+q)][a(a+p)+a(a+p+q)+(a+p)(a+p+q)]
If you multiply that all the way out and collect terms (whew!),
you will get this:
9a³+18a²p+9a²q+11ap²+11apq+2aq²+2p³+3p²q+pq²
Make the same substitutions in the right side of the inequality:
9a(a+p)(a+p+q)
If you multiply that all the way out and collect terms (not quite
as tedious) you will get this:
9a³+18a²p+9a²q+9ap²+9apq
So the inequality we are to prove becomes
9a³+18a²p+9a²q+11ap²+11apq+2aq²+2p³+3p²q+pq² ≧ 9a³+18a²p+9a²q+9ap²+9apq
For contradiction assume the inequality can be <, that is, assume that
for some non-negative p and q, this holds:
9a³+18a²p+9a²q+11ap²+11apq+2aq²+2p³+3p²q+pq² < 9a³+18a²p+9a²q+9ap²+9apq
Subtracting the right side from the left:
2ap²+2apq+2aq²+2p³+3p²q+pq² < 0
Since all the terms on the left are non-negative,
this is clearly false, so < can never hold, thus
we have reached a contradiction. ≧ always
holds and the original inequality is proved true. QED
Edwin
|
|
|