SOLUTION: Quadrilateral PQRS is cyclic and side PS = u is a diameter of the circle. If PQ = QR = v, RS = w, and u, v, and w are integers such that v does not equal w, prove that u cannot b

Algebra ->  Geometry-proofs -> SOLUTION: Quadrilateral PQRS is cyclic and side PS = u is a diameter of the circle. If PQ = QR = v, RS = w, and u, v, and w are integers such that v does not equal w, prove that u cannot b      Log On


   



Question 1208064: Quadrilateral PQRS is cyclic and side PS = u is a
diameter of the circle. If PQ = QR = v, RS = w, and u, v,
and w are integers such that v does not equal w, prove that u cannot be a
prime number.

Found 5 solutions by Edwin McCravy, mccravyedwin, AnlytcPhil, Plocharczyk, ikleyn:
Answer by Edwin McCravy(20056) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!

Maybe Ikleyn or Greenestamps can simplify my solution but here it is at last.

Since quadrilaterals are normally lettered counter-clockwise, and PS is a
diameter, the quadrilateral must be inscribed in a semi-circle. I will need
some right triangles so I will bisect everything including the diameter. The
green line segments are the perpendicular bisectors of the upper 3 sides and
the angles as well since the triangles are isosceles. So the radius of the
circle is u/2, and will be the hypotenuse of all 6 right triangles in this figure:



[eqs. A]  sin%28alpha%29=%22v%2F2%22%2F%22u%2F2%22=+v%2Fu and sin%28beta%29=%22w%2F2%22%2F%22u%2F2%22=+w%2Fu

The sum of all 6 angles is 180o

4alpha%2B2beta=180%5Eo
2alpha%2Bbeta=90%5Eo
2α and β are complementary,
alpha%2B%28alpha%2Bbeta%29=90%5Eo
α and α+β are also complementary

So 

[eq. B]   cos%28alpha%29cos%28beta%29=sin%28alpha%29%2Bsin%28alpha%29sin%28beta%29

2alpha%2Bbeta=90%5Eo. Taking sines of both sides:

sin%282alpha%2Bbeta%29=1

sin%282alpha%29cos%28beta%29%2Bcos%282alpha%29sin%28beta%29=1
%282sin%28alpha%29cos%28alpha%29%5E%22%22%29cos%28beta%29%2Bcos%282alpha%29sin%28beta%29=1
Using the associative law and since 2α and β are complementary,
2sin%28alpha%29%28cos%28alpha%29cos%28beta%29%5E%22%22%29%2Bsin%28beta%29sin%28beta%29=1
Substituting from [eq. B] above



2sin%5E2%28alpha%29%2B2sin%5E2%28alpha%29sin%28beta%29%2Bsin%5E2%28beta%29=1

From [eqs. A]

2%28v%2Fu%29%5E2%2B2%28v%2Fu%29%5E2%28w%2Fu%29%2B%28w%2Fu%29%5E2=1

2v%5E2%2Fu%5E2%2B%282v%5E2w%29%2Fu%5E3%2Bw%5E2%2Fu%5E2=1

Multiply through by u3

2uv%5E2%2B2v%5E2w%2Buw%5E2=u%5E3

%28u%29w%5E2%2B%282v%5E2%29w%2B%282uv%5E2-u%5E3%29=0

Since %22%22%2B-u are factors of the last term, we try both and
find that w=-u is a solution and so we factor it by synthetic 
division

-u | u      2v2   2uv2-u3
   |        -u2  -2uv2+u3
     u   2v2-u2         0

%28w%2Bu%5E%22%22%5E%22%22%29%28u%2Aw%2B%282v%5E2-u%5E2%29%5E%22%22%29=0

w%2Bu=0;  u%2Aw%2B%282v%5E2-u%5E2%29=0
w=-u;    u%2Aw=u%5E2-2v%5E2
              w=%28u%5E2-2v%5E2%29%2Fu%5E%22%22
              w=u-2v%5E2%2Fu%5E%22%22
              2v%5E2%2Fu%5E%22%22=u-w 
              
So the term 2v%5E2%2Fu%5E%22%22 must be an integer, since the terms 
on the right are integers.

For contradiction, assume u is a prime number.

If u=2, then the radius is 1, and the semicircle is π.

So 2v%2Bw%3Cpi, that would make v=1, w=2. then triangle
SRO would have sides 1,1,2 which violates the triangle
inequality.  So u is not the prime number 2.

Thus u must divide evenly into v2.   But if u is a prime 
then u must divide evenly into v as well. This cannot be true 
because v < u, the diameter.

Thus we have a contradiction and u cannot be a prime number. 

Edwin

Answer by mccravyedwin(407) About Me  (Show Source):
Answer by AnlytcPhil(1806) About Me  (Show Source):
Answer by Plocharczyk(17) About Me  (Show Source):
Answer by ikleyn(52794) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.
Quadrilateral PQRS is cyclic and side PS = u is a
diameter of the circle. If PQ = QR = v, RS = w, and u, v,
and w are integers such that v does not equal w, prove that u cannot be a
prime number.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


        I will give another solution,  different from  Edwin,  and more compact.


Make a sketch.


So, you have quadrilateral PQRS inscribed in the circle such that PS 
is a diameter of this circle; PQ = QR = v; RS = w; PS = u.


Draw the diagonal PR.  Let PR = d (the length).


We have isosceles triangle PQR.  Using the cosine law, we can write

    d%5E2 = v%5E2+%2B+v%5E2+-+2v%2Av%2Acos%28Q%29

or

    d%5E2 = 2v%5E2+-+2v%5E2%2Acos%28Q%29.    (1)


From the other hand, triangle PRS is the right triangle, since angle PRS 
leans on the diameter PS.  Therefore,

    d%5E2 = u%5E2+-+w%5E2.             (2)


From (1) and (2), we can exclude  d%5E2  and write

    2v%5E2+-+2v%5E2%2Acos%28Q%29 = u%5E2+-+w%5E2.    (3)


Since quadrilateral PQRS is inscribed in the circle, its opposite angles S and Q 
are supplementary:  S + Q = pi.  Therefore,  cos(Q) = -cos(S).


Hence, from (3) we have

    2v%5E2+%2B+2v%5E2%2Acos%28S%29 = u%5E2+-+w%5E2.    (4)


Next,  cos(S) = w%2Fu  (from the right triangle PRS).

Thus

    2v%5E2+%2B+2v%5E2%2A%28w%2Fu%29 = u%5E2+-+w%5E2.      (5)


Multiply both sides of (5) by  "u".  You will get

    2v%5E2%2Au+%2B+2v%5E2%2Aw = u%5E3+-+w%5E2%2Au.


Combine the terms with "u" on the right side; keep the remaining term  2v%5E2%2Aw  on the left side

    2%2Av%5E2%2Aw = u%5E3+-+w%5E2%2Au+-+2%2Av%5E2%2Au.   (6)


In (6), right side is a multiple of "u".  So, if "u" is a prime number, 
then left side  2v%5E2%2Aw  is a multiple of "u".


Hence, EITHER "u" divides 2,  OR  "u" divides  v%5E2,  OR  "u"  divides  "w".


It leads to contradiction, since

    - if "u" divides 2, then u= 2;  but then from the right triangle PRS the leg w
      must be shorter than the hypotenuse u, i.e. w= 1; and side v must be shorter 
      than the diameter u= 2; so, in this case w = v, which is excluded in the problem.


    - if "u" divides v%5E2, then "u" divides "v";  but it is impossible, since 
      "v" is less than "u" (the diameter).


    - if "u" divides "w", it is also impossible, since "w" is less than "u" (the diameter).


These contradictions prove that "u" can not be a prime number.

Solved.