Instead of doing your problem for you, I'll do one exactly in every detail
like yours so that you can do yours yourself using this as a model. You
won't learn it as well if I do it for you. I'll do this one instead:
State the vertical, horizontal asymptotes and zeros of the rational function,

Why is there no zero at x = –3?
First we'll get the horizontal asymptote's equation:
Since the numerator and denominator have the same degree, the horizontal
asymptote's equation is


That's




Now let's answer the question "Why is there no zero at x = –3?"
Let's substitute -2 for x and see:
One of the impossible things in mathematics is division
by zero. So that's why I crossed this out, and it's why f(-3)
is not a zero.
Now we'll go back and find the vertical asymptotes
We factor numerator and denominator:
Now since the (x+3)'s will cancel, that will give us another function g(x)
which is exactly like f(x) except it WILL have a zero at x=-3 whereas f(x)
does not have a zero there:
So we get
And we find the vertical asymptote's equation by setting the denominator = 0:
x+4 = 0
So the vertical asymptote's equation is x = -4
Now we graph g(x) by graphing the horizontal and vertical asymptotes (in green)
and making a table of values:
x y
-14 2.5
-9 3
-5 7
-3 -3
0 1
6 1.5
That's the graph of g(x) but the graph of f(x) must
have a hole at (-3,-3) because that's not part of the
graph:
Edwin