Question 1169709: for each of the following, give the amplitude, the period, and describe any vertical or horizontal shifts away from the origin(i.e. from the standard parent graph)
2a f(x) = -2sin[3(x-pi/2)] + 4
b. f(x) = -cos(2x -pi/4) -3
c. f(x) = 2tan(x/3) -1
d. f(x) = -sec(pi- 5x)
Found 2 solutions by MathLover1, ikleyn: Answer by MathLover1(20849) (Show Source): Answer by ikleyn(52781) (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website! .
for each of the following, give the amplitude, the period, and describe any vertical or horizontal shifts
away from the origin(i.e. from the standard parent graph)
2a f(x) = -2sin[3(x-pi/2)] + 4
b. f(x) = -cos(2x -pi/4) -3
c. f(x) = 2tan(x/3) -1
d. f(x) = -sec(pi- 5x)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The analysis given by @MathLover1, has ERRORS, that are extremely dangerous for a beginning student.
Therefore, I came to FIX her errors and to bring a CORRECT ANALYSIS with detailed explanations.
Case (a)
f(x) = -2sin[3(x-pi/2)] + 4.
It is obvious that the amplitude is |-2| = 2 and that the period is ; vertical shift is 4 units up.
For the further analysis, especially for the accurate analysis of the horizontal shift, you MUST write
the given function with the POSITIVE leading factor (amplitude).
// If you do not make it (as @MathLover1 NEGLECTS do it at every her attempt), you analysis INEVITABLY will be ERRONEOUS. //
So I write equivalent transformations
f(x) = = =
I want to make the leading coefficient positive. For it, I continue
= (I change the leading sign by adding to the sine argument, and then continue further)
= = .
Now, having written the sine function in standard CANONIC form with the positive leading coefficient,
I can make the standard analysis for the shift, and I can safely conclude that the horizontal shift is units to the right.
Now look into the plot below, which CONFIRMS my analysis.
Plot y = (the given function, red),
and y = sin(3x) (the parent function for the shift analysis, green)
Notice that, when we compare the shift, our reference parent function for the comparison is y = sin(3x), shown by green in my plot.
Case (b)
f(x) = -cos(2x -pi/4) -3.
It is obvious that the amplitude is |-1| = 1 and that the period is = ; vertical shift is 3 units down.
For the further analysis, especially for the accurate analysis of the horizontal shift, you MUST write
the given function with the POSITIVE leading factor (amplitude).
// If you do not make it (as @MathLover1 NEGLECTS do it at every her attempt), you analysis INEVITABLY will be ERRONEOUS. //
So I write equivalent transformations
f(x) = = =
I want to make the leading coefficient positive. For it, I continue
= (I change the leading sign by adding to the cosine argument, and then continue further)
= = .
Now, having written the sine function in CANONIC form with the positive leading coefficient,
I can make the standard analysis for the shift, and I can safely conclude that the horizontal shift is units to the left.
Now look into the plot below, which CONFIRMS my analysis.
Plot y = (the given function, red),
and y = cos(2x) (the parent function for the shift analysis, green)
Notice that, when we compare the shift, our reference parent function for the comparison is y = cos(2x), shown by green in my plot.
Case (d)
f(x) = -sec(pi-5x).
In this case, there is NO amplitude. Obviously, the period is ; there is NO vertical shift.
For the further analysis, especially for the accurate analysis of the horizontal shift, you MUST write
the given function with the POSITIVE leading factor.
So I write equivalent transformations
f(x) = =
I want to make the leading coefficient positive. For it, I change
the leading sign by subtracting to the sec argument, and then continue further
= = = use the fact that sec is an EVEN function = .
Now, having written the sec function in CANONIC form with the positive leading coefficient,
I can make the standard analysis for the shift, and I can safely conclude that the horizontal shift is 0 (zero, ZERO) in this case.
Now look into the plot below, which CONFIRMS my analysis.
Plot y = (the given function, red),
and y = sec(5x) + 0.2 (the parent function for the shift analysis, green)
Notice that, when we compare the shift, our reference parent function for the comparison is y = sec(5x), shown by green in my plot.
To make two plots distinguishable, I added 0.2 to the reference function // othewise, the plot are identical and the difference is not seen.
==============
At this point, my solution is COMPLETED.
I hope that the reader sees now all errors of the solution by @MathLover1.
She really made all possible and typical errors in her analysis.
I really glad that I had the opportunity to fix all these errors and to teach the reader TO AVOID them.
|
|
|