SOLUTION: I am trying to solve a lesson example in my algebra 2 textbook. I don't understand the graph they used for the solution. Here is the question: Gillian is planning a green roof

Algebra ->  College  -> Linear Algebra -> SOLUTION: I am trying to solve a lesson example in my algebra 2 textbook. I don't understand the graph they used for the solution. Here is the question: Gillian is planning a green roof       Log On


   



Question 741884: I am trying to solve a lesson example in my algebra 2 textbook. I don't understand the graph they used for the solution. Here is the question:
Gillian is planning a green roof that will cover up to 600 square feet. She will use two types of plants: blue lagoon sedum and raspberry red sedum. Each blue lagoon sedum will cover 1.2 square feet. Each raspberry red sedum will cover 2 square feet. Each plant costs $2.50, and Gillian must spend less than $1000. Write the constraints, and graph the feasible region.
x = # of blue lagoon sedums
y = # of raspberry red sedums
The book uses the equations:
x >= 0
y >= 0
1.2x + 2y <= 600
2.50x + 2.50y <= 1000
I solved 1.2x + 2y <= 600 for y. I got y >= -0.66 + 300.
When I solve 2.50x + 2.50y <= 1000 for y I get x >= y + 400 (by replacing y with -0.66 + 300).
The graph in the book shows 300 as the y intercept and 400 as the x intercept. If they are using y = mx + b format, I don't know if I should have solved 2.50x + 2.50y <= 1000 for y or x. Whether I solve for x or y I still come out with a y intercept of 400. What am I doing wrong?

Answer by KMST(5328) About Me  (Show Source):
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Very often you do not have to solve for x or y.
Your boundary lines will be straight lines, and to graph each line, you will need at most 2 points. Finding and plotting those 2 points may be easier than you think.

The book uses
x+%3E=+0 because the number for x cannot be negative
y+%3E=+0 because the number for y cannot be negative
Those are two of the constraint.
1.2x+%2B+2y is the surface area that the plants will cover, in square feet, which could be up to 600 square feet. That gives you the inequality
1.2x+%2B+2y+%3C=+600
The total cost, in $, will be 2.50x+%2B2.50y and must not be more than $1000, and that gives you the inequality
2.50x+%2B+2.50y+%3C=+1000

THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FEASIBLE REGION:
x=0 and y=0 are the y an x axes respectively (no calculations needed to graph those lines), and the space where x%3E=0 and y%3E=0 is the first quadrant including the pieces of the axes that border the quadrant.
The boundary line 1.2x%2B2y=600 is a straight line that passes through A(0,300) and P(500,0)
because x=0 means 1.2%2A0%2B2y=600 --> 2y=600 --> y=300 and
y=0 means 1.2x%2B2%2A0=600 --> 1.2x=600 --> x=500
Another boundary is 2.50x%2B2.50y=1000 --> x%2By=400 (dividing everything by 2.50).
Making x=0 first and then y=0 (as for the other line), you can easily find that x%2By=400 passes through Q(0,400) and C(400,0).

The graph of the boundaries looks like this:
The feasible region is the quadrilateral ABCO.
How do we know that the feasible region is the part below both slanted lines?
We know that
1.2x%2B2y=600 (line AP), and
x%2By=400 (line QC) are boundary lines.
For x%2By%3C=400 the boundary line is x%2By=400.
The points to one side of that line have x%2By%3C400, and the points to the other side have x%2By%3E400.
What side satisfies x%2By%3C400?
We can check with a test point that is not on the boundary line.
An easy choice for a test point is O(0,0). Is it part of the solution to x%2By%3C=400?
When x=0 and y=0, x%2By=0%3C400, so O(0,0) satisfies x%2By%3C400 and so do all the points on the same side of QC.
Similarly, you can find that the side of 1.2x%2B2y=600 that is the solution you 1.2x%2B2y%3C=600 is the side that contains O(0,0).
The only hard-work calculation you could have to do is finding the coordinates of point B, if you need to, but you may not be expected to do that for this problem.
If you had to, the coordinates of point B are the solution to
system%281.2x%2B2y=600%2Cx%2By=400%29.

NOTE:
You may think that you have to solve for y to get
x%2By%3C=400 --> y%3C=400-x to figure out that the points that satisfy
x%2By%3C=400 are those below the line x%2By=400 <--> y=400-x but you do not need to do that much work (unless your teacher wants you to do it that way).