document.write( "Question 1210522: Two regular pentagons and a regular decagon, all with the same side length, can completely surround a point, as shown.\r
\n" );
document.write( "
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "An equilateral triangle, a regular octagon, a square, a regular pentagon, and a regular n-gon, all with the same side length, also completely surround a point. Find n. \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #853459 by ikleyn(53646) You can put this solution on YOUR website! . \n" ); document.write( "Two regular pentagons and a regular decagon, all with the same side length, can completely surround a point, as shown.\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "An equilateral triangle, a regular octagon, a square, a regular pentagon, and a regular n-gon, all with the same side length, \n" ); document.write( "also completely surround a point. Find n. \n" ); document.write( "~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "(1) As the question is posed in the post, it is formulated in unsatisfactory form, in my view. \n" ); document.write( "According to the context of the problem, the question should ask about possible pairs/combinations of n-gons. \n" ); document.write( "Below is my solution for this modified formulation.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "(2) The post by @CPhill has no clearly written answer.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "His text is badly organized, badly structured, badly worded, and factually is unreadable. \n" ); document.write( "It is impossible to read it, impossible to understand, as well as impossible to discuss it. \n" ); document.write( "So, from the point of view of a reader, the quality of the @CPhill solution and the quality of his presentation \n" ); document.write( "is below the floor level, i.e. is below zero.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Therefore, I present my solution below.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \r\n" ); document.write( "My solution consists of two tables. First table is for interior angles of n-gons for n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12.\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "Second table contains the answers in the form of possible combinations.\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " T A B L E 1 : Interior angles of several regular n-gons\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "n-gon, n: 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 12 15 18 20\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "interior angle, 60 90 108 120 135 140 144 150\r\n" ); document.write( " degrees\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " T A B L E 2 : T h e a n s w e r \r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "Combinations: n * angle1 + m * angle2 = 360 degrees ( angle1 and angle2 are interior angles )\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 6 * 60 = 360 6 equilateral triangles\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 3 * 60 + 2 * 90 = 360 3 eq. triangles + 2 squares \r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 4 * 90 = 360 4 squares\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 2 * 108 + 1 * 144 = 360 2 reg. pentagons and 1 reg. 10-gon\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 2 * 135 + 1 * 90 = 360 2 reg. octagons + 1 square\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " 2 * 150 + 1 * 60 = 360 2 reg. 12-gons + 1 eq. triangle\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "The solution method is, actually, trial and error by brute force, and I did it mentally.\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "@CPhill, actually, tries to do the same using a computer code,\r\n" ); document.write( "but my presentation of the solution and of the answer is incomparable better than that by @CPhill (in my opinion).\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "I do not try to impress a reader by my knowledge of names for regular n-gons, as @CPhill does,\r\n" ); document.write( "but simply present the logic, the solution and the answer in clear straightforward way.\r\n" ); document.write( "\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Solved.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "-------------------------\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "As I observe the @CPhill compositions every day,\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "this person simply does not know true commonly accepted standards of formulation to Math problems, \n" ); document.write( "as well does not know true commonly accepted standards for presentations of their solutions.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Therefore, every day he constantly tries to break the existing standards and to re-establish them at the lowest level, \n" ); document.write( "which corresponds to his own level in Math.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "It is inacceptable attempt which must be resolutely rejected by the community.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |