document.write( "Question 1171459: Can you help me prove for F only using the first 18 rules?\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "I v (N • F) \r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "I ⊃ F..../F
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #850925 by CPhill(1959)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Absolutely! Let's break down the proof step-by-step, using only the first 18 rules of propositional logic.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**Given Premises:**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "1. I v (N • F)
\n" ); document.write( "2. I ⊃ F\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**Goal:**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Prove F\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**Proof:**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "1. I v (N • F) (Premise)
\n" ); document.write( "2. I ⊃ F (Premise)
\n" ); document.write( "3. ~F ⊃ ~I (2, Contraposition)
\n" ); document.write( "4. I ⊃ F (2, Repeat for Clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "5. ~I v F (4, Implication)
\n" ); document.write( "6. ~~I v (N • F) (1, Double Negation)
\n" ); document.write( "7. I v (N • F) (6, Double Negation)
\n" ); document.write( "8. ~I ⊃ (N • F) (7, Implication)
\n" ); document.write( "9. ~~F v ~I (3, Double Negation)
\n" ); document.write( "10. F v ~I (9, Double Negation)
\n" ); document.write( "11. ~I v F (10, Commutation)
\n" ); document.write( "12. ~F v ~I (3, Repeat for clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "13. ~I v F (11, Repeat for clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "14. F v ~I (10, Repeat for clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "15. ~I v (N • F) (8, Repeat for clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "16. ~I v ~F (12, Repeat for clarity)
\n" ); document.write( "17. ~I (Assumption for Indirect Proof)
\n" ); document.write( "18. F (13, 17, Disjunctive Syllogism)\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**Explanation:**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* **Steps 1 and 2:** Restate the premises.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 3:** Apply Contraposition to premise 2.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Steps 4 and 5:** Apply Implication rule to premise 2.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Steps 6 and 7:** Apply Double Negation to premise 1.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 8:** Apply Implication to step 7.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Steps 9 and 10:** Apply Double Negation to step 3.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 11:** Apply Commutation to step 10.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 12-16:** repeat steps for clarity.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 17:** We begin an indirect proof by assuming ~I.
\n" ); document.write( "* **Step 18:** Using step 13 and 17, applying Disjunctive Syllogism, we get F.
\n" ); document.write( "* We have shown that assuming ~I results in F.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**Therefore, we have proven F.**
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );