document.write( "Question 1182025: A student tried to trisect an angle G using the following procedure:
\n" ); document.write( "1. Mark off GA congruent to GB.
\n" ); document.write( "2. Draw AB
\n" ); document.write( "3. Divide AB into 3 congruent parts so that AX=XY=YB.
\n" ); document.write( "4. Draw GX and GY.
\n" ); document.write( "Show that the student did not trisect angle G (Hint: Show that GA>GY. Then use indirect proof to show that m\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "I know how to show that GA>GY (by SAS Inequality) but cannot show why m\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #849956 by CPhill(1959)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
You're asking to prove that a student's method for trisecting an angle doesn't actually work. Here's a breakdown of the proof:\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**1. Definitions and Setup**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* We're given that GA is congruent to GB, and AX = XY = YB. This means AY = (2/3)AB.
\n" ); document.write( "* We want to show that angle AGX, angle XGY, and angle YGB are *not* all equal.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**2. Showing GA > GY**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* Consider triangle GAY. By the triangle inequality theorem, the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. Therefore, GA + AY > GY.
\n" ); document.write( "* We know GA = GB. Since AX = XY = YB, Y lies between A and B, making AY < AB. So AY = (2/3)AB < AB.
\n" ); document.write( "* Now, assume, for the sake of contradiction, that GA <= GY. Since GA + AY > GY, then GY + AY > GY, which means AY > 0 (always true).
\n" ); document.write( "* However, if we assume GA = GY, then triangle GAY is isosceles. Since A, X, and Y are collinear, this would imply that GX is the angle bisector of angle AGY. In triangle GAB, since GA = GB, the median from G to AB will bisect angle AGB. Since GX is not a median, GX is not the angle bisector. Therefore, GA != GY.
\n" ); document.write( "* Since GA != GY and GA + AY > GY, then GA > GY.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**3. Indirect Proof**\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* **Assumption:** Let's assume, for the sake of contradiction, that the student's method *does* trisect the angle. This means ∠AGX = ∠XGY = ∠YGB.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* **Consequence of the Assumption:** If the angles are equal, and we know GA = GB and AX = XY = YB, then by the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence theorem, triangles GAX and GYX would be congruent. This would imply that GX = GY.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* **Contradiction:** But we've already proven that GA > GY. If GX = GY, then we would also have GA = GY, which contradicts our earlier finding.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "* **Conclusion:** Our initial assumption that the angles are equal must be false. Therefore, the student's method does *not* trisect the angle.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "**In simpler terms:** The student's construction makes it look like the angle is trisected, but it's a visual trick. The side GY is shorter than GA, which prevents the equal angles from being created.
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );