document.write( "Question 1169998: The problem I got incorrect:
\n" ); document.write( "Find inverse of h(x)=(3/4)x+12
\n" ); document.write( "My steps...
\n" ); document.write( "1) y = (3/4)x+12
\n" ); document.write( "2) (4/3)y = x+12
\n" ); document.write( "3) (4/3)y-12 = x
\n" ); document.write( "4) (4/3)x-12 = y
\n" ); document.write( "5) h^-1(x) = (4/3)x-12\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Am told correct answer should be h^-1(x) = (4/3)(x-12).
\n" ); document.write( "Could someone explain the property I missed applying?
\n" ); document.write( "Thank you.
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #794892 by greenestamps(13200)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!


\n" ); document.write( "Between your steps (1) and (2), you attempted to multiply everything by 4/3, but you did not -- you didn't multiply the \"12\" by 4/3. Your step (2) should show

\n" ); document.write( "(4/3)y=x+16

\n" ); document.write( "That would lead you to the answer

\n" ); document.write( "h^-1(x) = (4/3)x-16

\n" ); document.write( "which is equivalent to the given answer of

\n" ); document.write( "h^-1(x) = (4/3)(x-12)

\n" ); document.write( "------------------------------------

\n" ); document.write( "Note for many simple functions, there is an easier and faster way to find the inverse of a function, using the idea that the inverse \"un-does\" what the function does.

\n" ); document.write( "In this example, what the function does to the input is
\n" ); document.write( "(1) multiply by (3/4); and
\n" ); document.write( "(2) add 12

\n" ); document.write( "To \"undo\" those operations, the inverse function has to perform the opposite operations in the opposite order:
\n" ); document.write( "(1) subtract 12; and
\n" ); document.write( "(2) divide by (3/4) -- i.e., multiply by (4/3)

\n" ); document.write( "Those two steps immediately give you the inverse function:

\n" ); document.write( "h^-1(x) = (4/3)(x-12)

\n" ); document.write( "-----------------------------------------------

\n" ); document.write( "comment from student....

\n" ); document.write( "Thank you for suggestion on how to determine inverse of many simple functions; that appears a sound approach. But going back to my initial mistake, let’s consider only the part of this problem where we start with y isolated on one side ( y= (3/4)x+12 ), and we want to rearrange the equation so that instead x is the isolated variable. When I undo the multiplication of (3/4)x on the right side by dividing y on the left by 3/4 (actually multiplying by inverse), at that point, y is the only term on the left side. When proceeding by moving the 12 over to left I’m puzzled how I should have known to multiply it by 4/3 also (or that I could have stopped short of doing the final distribution by writing 4/3(x-12)). Is there something incorrect/unsound with beginning to rearrange the equation by undoing the multiplication?

\n" ); document.write( "----------------------------------------------------

\n" ); document.write( "No; there is nothing wrong with \"undoing the multiplication\" to start on the problem. But you need to do it correctly.

\n" ); document.write( "Undoing the multiplication means multiplying EVERYTHING on both sides of the equation by (4/3). In your work, you only multiplied parts of the equation by (4/3).

\n" ); document.write( "\"y+=+%283%2F4%29x%2B12\"
\n" ); document.write( "--> \"%284%2F3%29y+=+%284%2F3%29%283%2F4%29x+%2B+%284%2F3%2912\"
\n" ); document.write( "--> \"%284%2F3%29y+=+x+%2B+16\"

\n" ); document.write( "When you \"proceed\" from there, there is no \"12\" to move to the left; it is a \"16\".
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );