document.write( "Question 1135774:  Please help! I can't for the life of me figure this one out!\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "Proof by natural deduction- Predicate Logic. Use a direct proof to show that the following argument is valid.\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "Premise 1: (∃x)Kx --> (x) (Lx --> Mx)
\n" );
document.write( " Premise 2: Kc • Lc
\n" );
document.write( " Conclusion: Mc\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( " \n" );
document.write( "
| Algebra.Com's Answer #753448 by MathLover1(20850)     You can put this solution on YOUR website! Hint : assuming you are using Natural Deduction\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "From Premise-2 : Kc∧Lc\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "you have to derive Kc (by ∧-elimination), followed by ∃xKx (by ∃-introduction).\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "In this way, you can use → -elimination (i.e. modus ponens) with Premise-1 and derive : (∀x)(Lx→Mx).\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Now you have to use ∀-elimination (i.e. universal instantiation) with c to get : Lc→Mc. \n" ); document.write( " |