document.write( "Question 1132243: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion of the following arguments. Do not use conditional proof or indirect proof.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "1. R v ~S
\n" ); document.write( "2. ~R v T
\n" ); document.write( "3. T ⊃ (S • U) \r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Conclusion: S ≡ T
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #749228 by jim_thompson5910(35256)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Here is one way to do a proof derivation to get the conclusion
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "
NumberStatementLines UsedReason
1R v ~S
2~R v T
3T --> (S & U)
:.S = T
4~S v R1Commutation
5~~S --> R4Material Implication
6S --> R5Double Negation
7~~R --> T2Material Implication
8R --> T7Double Negation
9S --> T6,8Hypothetical Syllogism
10~T v (S & U)3Material Implication
11(~T v S) & (~T v U)10Distribution
12~T v S11Simplification
13~~T --> S12Material Implication
14T --> S13Double Negation
15(S --> T) & (T --> S)9,14Conjunction
16S = T15Material Equivalence
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );