document.write( "Question 1113762: I need help on constructing the proof to make the argument valid. The Commas are the breaks. Also, I don't know if I am doing this right\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "9.~~A, B-> ~A, A :. ~B\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "My work:\r
\n" );
document.write( "
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "1.~~A
\n" );
document.write( "2. B->~A
\n" );
document.write( "3. A
\n" );
document.write( "4. :. ~B\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "ADD Step 1, 2
\n" );
document.write( "MT Steps 3, 4\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "Am I correct? I don't know if I am doing this right? \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #728854 by math_helper(2461)![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! I need help on constructing the proof to make the argument valid. The Commas are the breaks. Also, I don't know if I am doing this right\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "9.~~A, B-> ~A, A :. ~B\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "My work:\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "1.~~A \n" ); document.write( "2. B->~A \n" ); document.write( "3. A \n" ); document.write( "4. :. ~B\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "ADD Step 1, 2 \n" ); document.write( "MT Steps 3, 4\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Am I correct? I don't know if I am doing this right?\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "————————————————————————————————————— \n" ); document.write( " \r\n" ); document.write( "I do not think you can use ADD 1,2. Disjunction Introduction (aka ADD) works like this:\r\n" ); document.write( "1. Q \r\n" ); document.write( "2. Q v P 1 ADD (essentially, if \"Q\" is true then \"Q or P\" is true)\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "------------------------------ \n" ); document.write( "Here's how I'd do it, being careful to use Double Negation introduction because many formal logic texts \n" ); document.write( "say \"it is not the case that it is not raining\" is weaker than \"it is raining\" and therefore treat ~~A as slightly weaker than A. The two are not directly interchangeable without DN elimination or DN introduction (sigh):\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \r\n" ); document.write( "1. ~~A Premise \r\n" ); document.write( "2. B-->~A Premise \r\n" ); document.write( "3. A Premise\r\n" ); document.write( "4. ~~A 3 Double Negation (DN) \r\n" ); document.write( "5. ~B 2,4 Modus Tollens (MT) (Conclusion)\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "I used to be very good at formal logic, but I'm rusty. Another tutor may look at my solution and come up with a better one. I'm pretty certain about not using 1,2 ADD though. \n" ); document.write( "------------------------- \n" ); document.write( "EDIT: As I was reviewing this, I noticed 3. A is probably one of your proof lines (not a premise). If so, then the proof can be shortened:\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \r\n" ); document.write( "1. ~~A Premise \r\n" ); document.write( "2. B-->~A Premise \r\n" ); document.write( "3. ~B 1,2 Modus Tollens (MT) (Conclusion)\r\n" ); document.write( "\r\n" ); document.write( "\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |