document.write( "Question 1061923: looking for help on why the argument is or is not valid on these two. Can anyone help me out...thanks in advance. Validity of each argument\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "For the first problem I began with ( p U q) u r
\n" ); document.write( " P'U Q
\n" ); document.write( " ________
\n" ); document.write( " R\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "( p v q ) → r
\n" ); document.write( "~ p → q
\n" ); document.write( "______________
\n" ); document.write( "r\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "( p → q) →r
\n" ); document.write( "~p v q
\n" ); document.write( "_______________
\n" ); document.write( "r V q\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #676702 by solver91311(24713)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "For the first one, Material Implication says that p V q is equivalent to ~p -> q. So you can simply replace one expression with the other and then the conclusion is true by Modus Ponens.\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "The second one is true for the same reason. p -> q is equivalent to ~p V q, again by Material Implication.\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "See: Material Implication\r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "John
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );