document.write( "Question 1037247: Sketch a graph of a function f that satisfies the following conditions: \r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "f does NOT have an inverse function \r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "f(x) > x for all x \r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "f(1) > 0
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #652589 by robertb(5830)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Let \"f%28x%29+=+x%5E2+-+x+%2B+3\".\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "f has no inverse function since it fails the horizontal line test for one-to-one-ness.
\n" ); document.write( "f(x) > x since, for all real x, \"x%5E2-2x%2B3+%3E0\", hence \"f%28x%29+=+x%5E2+-+x+%2B+3+%3E+x\".
\n" ); document.write( "Finally f(1) = 3 > 0.\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "\"graph%28+300%2C+200%2C+-5%2C+5%2C+-5%2C+5%2C+x%5E2+-+x+%2B3%2C+x+%29\".\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "(Notice that the parabola is entirely above the line y = x, which signifies f(x) > x for all x.)\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "There still many more functions that would satisfy the initial conditions.
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );