document.write( "Question 935534: Statements Reasons
\n" );
document.write( "DGF triangle is isosceles with base DF GIVEN\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "EGD angle is congruent to EGF angle GIVEN\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "EG segment is congruent to EG segment Reflexive Property\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "DG is congruent to FG GIVEN\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "FGE triangle is congruent to triangle EGD SAS\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "DEG angle is congruent to FEG angle CPCTC\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "Segment EG bisects DEF angle Angle Bisector Definition
\n" );
document.write( "My problem is I can not have a reason of GIVEN for step 4 but all other steps are correct not sure what I'm missing?\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( " \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #569000 by Theo(13342)![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! apparently you were not given that GD is congruent to GF. \n" ); document.write( "but you are given that the triangle is isosceles, and you are given that angle EGD is congruent to angle EGF. \n" ); document.write( "you are also given that DF is the base. \n" ); document.write( "the base angles of the triangle therefore have to be DEG and EFG because one sides of each of those angle is the base. \n" ); document.write( "since the triangle is isosceles, then the base angles must be congruent because that is one of the properties of an isosceles triangle. \n" ); document.write( "since the triangle is isosceles, then the sides opposite the base angles must also be congruent because that is also one of the properties of an isosceles triangle. \n" ); document.write( "without getting too deep into it, i would say a simpler reason might be:\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "DG is congruent to FG (By definition, an isosceles triangle is a triangle that has two equal sides and a third side, which is called the base).\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "you might also be able to shorten this to (definition of an isosceles triangle), but that may be too cryptic although i have seen other proofs that sometimes use shorter explanations such as that. \r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "it follows from the fact that you are given that the triangle is isosceles, and you are given that the base of the triangle is DF.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "that means that the two congruent sides must be DG and FG.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |