document.write( "Question 62823This question is from textbook
\n" );
document.write( ": How could nonparametric data be transformed into parametric data that could be used in an ANOVA? How do the fe and fo in a nonparametric test correspond to the SSE and the SSA in an ANOVA? \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #43724 by stanbon(75887)![]() ![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! I don't know the answer to your question. This is what Wikipedia \n" ); document.write( "says relating a nonparametric test to ANOVA. \n" ); document.write( "Cheers, \n" ); document.write( "Stan H. \n" ); document.write( "----------\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance \n" ); document.write( "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia \n" ); document.write( "Jump to: navigation, search \n" ); document.write( "In statistics, the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks (named after William Kruskal and Allen Wallis) is a non-parametric method for testing equality of population medians among groups. Intuitively, it is identical to a one-way analysis of variance with the data replaced by their ranks. It is an extension of the Mann-Whitney U test to 3 or more groups.\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Since it is a non-parametric method, the Kruskal-Wallis test does not assume a normal population, unlike the analogous one-way analysis of variance. However, it still assumes that population variabilities among groups are equal. To get around this limitation of the Kruskal-Wallis test, some statisticians suggest using a robust test for equal locations among groups instead. \n" ); document.write( "-----------\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "[edit] Method \n" ); document.write( "Rank all data from all groups together; i.e., rank the data from 1 to N ignoring group membership. Assign any tied values the average of the ranks they would have received had they not been tied. \n" ); document.write( "The test statistic is given by: , where: \n" ); document.write( "ng is the number of observations in group g \n" ); document.write( "rij is the rank (among all observations) of observation j from group i \n" ); document.write( "N is the total number of observations across all groups \n" ); document.write( ", \n" ); document.write( " is the average of all the rij, equal to (N + 1) / 2. \n" ); document.write( "Notice that the denominator of the expression for K is exactly (N − 1)N(N + 1) / 12. Thus . \n" ); document.write( "A correction for ties can be made by dividing K by , where G is the number of groupings of different tied ranks, and ti is the number of tied values within group i that are tied at a particular value. This correction usually makes little difference in the value of K unless there are a large number of ties. \n" ); document.write( "Finally, the p-value is approximated by . If some ni's are small (i.e., less than 5) the probability distribution of K can be quite different from this chi-square distribution. If a table of the chi-square probability distribution is available, the critical value of chi-square, , can be found by entering the table at g − 1 degrees of freedom and looking under the desired significance or alpha level. The null hypothesis of equal population medians would then be rejected if . Appropriate multiple comparisons would then be performed on the group medians. \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |