document.write( "Question 681470: Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. Give a reason for your conclusion. Show complete work and submit your solution to the Dropbox. \r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "I) If the cat does not have claws, then the cat cannot scratch the furniture.
\n" );
document.write( "II) If the cat can scratch the furniture, then the cat has claws.
\n" );
document.write( "III) If the cat has claws, then the cat can scratch the furniture.
\n" );
document.write( "a. I and II are equivalent
\n" );
document.write( "b. I and III are equivalent
\n" );
document.write( "c. II and III are equivalent
\n" );
document.write( "d. I, II, and III are equivalent
\n" );
document.write( "e. None are equivalent \r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "(Points : 4)
\n" );
document.write( " \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #422672 by MathLover1(20849)![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! the statements are: \n" ); document.write( "I) If the cat does not have claws, then the cat cannot scratch the furniture. \n" ); document.write( "II) If the cat can scratch the furniture, then the cat has claws. \n" ); document.write( "III) If the cat has claws, then the cat can scratch the furniture. \n" ); document.write( "you can solve this using truth tables. \n" ); document.write( "you would do so as follows: \n" ); document.write( " \r\n" ); document.write( "p = cat has claws\r\n" ); document.write( "q = cat scratches furniture\r\n" ); document.write( "~p->~q = I\r\n" ); document.write( "q->p = II\r\n" ); document.write( "p->q = III\r\n" ); document.write( "truth table:\r\n" ); document.write( " p q ~p ~q ~p->~q q->p p->q\r\n" ); document.write( " T T F F T T T\r\n" ); document.write( " T F F T T T F\r\n" ); document.write( " F T T F F F T\r\n" ); document.write( " F F T T T T T\r\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "from the truth tables, it appears that ~p->~q is equivalent to q->p because their truth tables are the same. \n" ); document.write( "that means that I is equivalent to II \n" ); document.write( "III is not equivalent to either one of them because its truth table is different. \n" ); document.write( "if we examine the statement, we will see why this is so. \n" ); document.write( "the statement are, once again: \n" ); document.write( "I) If the cat does not have claws, then the cat cannot scratch the furniture. \n" ); document.write( "II) If the cat can scratch the furniture, then the cat has claws. \n" ); document.write( "III) If the cat has claws, then the cat can scratch the furniture. \n" ); document.write( "statement II looks like it is the contrapositive of statement I. \n" ); document.write( "statement I says: \n" ); document.write( "if no claws, then no scratch furniture. \n" ); document.write( "statement II says: \n" ); document.write( "if scratch furniture, then claws. \n" ); document.write( "if the statement is: \n" ); document.write( "if no claws, then no scratch furniture \n" ); document.write( "then the contrapositive to that statement is: \n" ); document.write( "if scratch furniture, then claws. \n" ); document.write( "if the statement is: \n" ); document.write( "if scratch furniture, then claws \n" ); document.write( "then the contrapositive to that statement is: \n" ); document.write( "if no claws, then no scratch furniture. \n" ); document.write( "the statement and its contrapositive are equivalent which means if the statement is true then the contrapositive is also true and vice versa. \n" ); document.write( "this is the case between statements I and II. \n" ); document.write( "statement III says: \n" ); document.write( "if claws, then scratch furniture. \n" ); document.write( "the contrapositive to this would be. \n" ); document.write( "if no scratch furniture, then no claws. \n" ); document.write( "all 3 statements are: \n" ); document.write( "I = if no claws, then no scratch furniture \n" ); document.write( "II = if scratch furniture, then claws. \n" ); document.write( "III = if claws, then scratch furniture. \n" ); document.write( "the contrapositive to statement III is: \n" ); document.write( "if no scratch furniture, then no claws \n" ); document.write( "neither I or II are the contrapositive to statement III, therefore the only equivalent statement are I and II. \n" ); document.write( "It's a little convoluted, but that's the way it works out. \n" ); document.write( "Use of the truth tables can make sense of the insensible, assuming you know how to use them. \n" ); document.write( "p->q is only false if p is true and q is false. \n" ); document.write( "q->p is only false if q is true and p is false. \n" ); document.write( "~p->~q is only false if ~p is true and ~q is false. \n" ); document.write( "~q->~p is only false if ~q is true and ~p is false. \n" ); document.write( "that's the truth table for the implied statement.l\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |