document.write( "Question 484722: If the argument below is valid, name which of the four valid forms of argument is represented. If it is not valid, name the fallacy that is represented.
\n" );
document.write( "
\n" );
document.write( "If the water is filtered, then it does not contain lead.
\n" );
document.write( "The water does not contain lead.
\n" );
document.write( "Therefore, the water is filtered.\r
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "Would someone help me please? I'm not sure how to do this completely, because I am not good with these problems. \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #331606 by Deina(147)![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! You can Google \"logical fallacies\" and find them in any number of places.\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "This particular one, affirming the consequent, is in the category of \"Propositional fallacies.\"\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent \n" ); document.write( "Affirming the consequent, sometimes called converse error, is a formal fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form:\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " If P, then Q. \n" ); document.write( " Q. \n" ); document.write( " Therefore, P.\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "An argument of this form is invalid, i.e., the conclusion can be false even when statements 1 and 2 are true. Since P was never asserted as the only sufficient condition for Q, other factors could account for Q (while P was false).\r \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "The name affirming the consequent derives from the premise Q, which affirms the \"then\" clause of the conditional premise. \n" ); document.write( "And bob's your uncle! \n" ); document.write( " |