document.write( "Question 465848: Write the compound statement in words.
\n" );
document.write( "p = The puppy behaves well.
\n" );
document.write( "q = His owners are happy.
\n" );
document.write( "~(p -> q)
\n" );
document.write( "which one is correct I'm confussed.
\n" );
document.write( "1) It is not the case that if the puppy behaves well then his owners are happy.
\n" );
document.write( "2) The puppy does not behave well or his owners are happy.
\n" );
document.write( "3) If the puppy does not behave well then his owners are not happy.
\n" );
document.write( "4) It is not the case that the puppy behaves well if his owners are not happy.
\n" );
document.write( " ( I think it is 3 but I'm not sure.) \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #319225 by kingme18(98) You can put this solution on YOUR website! p -> q means: If the puppy behaves well, then his owners are happy. \n" ); document.write( "~(p -> q) negates the WHOLE THING all at once--don't distribute the \"not\", just leave it out front. Without looking at answer choices, I'd say something like \"NOT TRUE: If the puppy behaves well, then his owners are happy.\" That is what 1 says.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "3, which is what you were thinking, would look like ~p -> ~q. As much as it seems like we could have distributed the not (~), it's not legal in logic. \n" ); document.write( " |