document.write( "Question 241588: Simplify. Assume that no denominator is zero and that 0^0 is not considered. thanks\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "(a7/-7b^4) ^6
\n" ); document.write( "

Algebra.Com's Answer #176961 by Alan3354(69443)\"\" \"About 
You can put this solution on YOUR website!
\"%28a7%2F-7b%5E4%29%5E6\" Is that a7 a^7?
\n" ); document.write( "= \"%28a%5E7%2F7b%5E4%29%5E6\" for some reason the minus sign caused a problem
\n" ); document.write( "= \"a%5E42%2F117649b%5E24\"
\n" ); document.write( "-------------
\n" ); document.write( "Note: by convention, \"0%5E0+=+1\"
\n" ); document.write( "-----------------------
\n" ); document.write( "The following is a list of reasons why 0^0 should be 1. \r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Rotando & Korn show that if f and g are real functions that vanish at the origin and are analytic at 0 (infinitely differentiable is not sufficient), then f(x)^g(x) approaches 1 as x approaches 0 from the right.
\n" ); document.write( "From Concrete Mathematics p.162 (R. Graham, D. Knuth, O. Patashnik): \r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Some textbooks leave the quantity 0^0 undefined, because the functions 0^x and x^0 have different limiting values when x decreases to 0. But this is a mistake. We must define x^0=1 for all x , if the binomial theorem is to be valid when x=0 , y=0 , and/or x=-y . The theorem is too important to be arbitrarily restricted! By contrast, the function 0^x is quite unimportant.
\n" ); document.write( "Published by Addison-Wesley, 2nd printing Dec, 1988. \r
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "As a rule of thumb, one can say that 0^0 = 1 , but 0.0^(0.0) is undefined, meaning that when approaching from a different direction there is no clearly predetermined value to assign to 0.0^(0.0) ; but Kahan has argued that 0.0^(0.0) should be 1, because if f(x), g(x) --> 0 as x approaches some limit, and f(x) and g(x) are analytic functions, then f(x)^g(x) --> 1 .
\n" ); document.write( "The discussion of 0^0 is very old. Euler argues for 0^0 = 1 since a^0 = 1 for a not equal to 0 . The controversy raged throughout the nineteenth century, but was mainly conducted in the pages of the lesser journals: Grunert's Archiv and Schlomilch's Zeitshrift. Consensus has recently been built around setting the value of 0^0 = 1 .\r
\n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "
\n" ); document.write( "
\n" );