document.write( "Question 184560: I'm can't figure out how to create a quadratic equation out of the vertex and a point that it must pass through. All i've managed so far is some trial and error and come up with this.
\n" );
document.write( "y=2(x+2)²+4
\n" );
document.write( "From the vertex of (-2,4) and passing through (-1,8).
\n" );
document.write( "I have been fiddling around with it and have two ideas how to proceed.
\n" );
document.write( "I could change (x+2) to something else to move it along the x axis or change the first part of it to change the fatness or whichever you want to call it of the parabola. Regardless i figure there is a better way to do it other then trial and error, if it has been answered before i'm sorry I didn't see it. I'm self taught and this is the first time I really have had any problem. \r
\n" );
document.write( "
\n" );
document.write( "\n" );
document.write( "-Thanks \n" );
document.write( "
Algebra.Com's Answer #138539 by solver91311(24713)![]() ![]() You can put this solution on YOUR website! \r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "If you have three points on a parabola, you can determine the equation of the parabola by substituting the coordinates of your points into:\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Giving you three simultaneous linear equations that can be solved for the values of the coefficients A, B, and C.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "But you only have two points, namely the vertex and one other point. However, if you use the properties of symmetry for a parabola, you can easily develop the coordinates of the third point.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Your only problem is that you must decide whether your parabola's axis of symmetry is vertical, giving you an equation where y is defined in terms of x, or whether the axis is horizontal, giving you an equation where x is defined in terms of y.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "If (-2, 4) is the vertex and (-1,8) is a point on the parabola with a vertical axis of symmetry, there is another point on the parabola with a y value of 8 and the x value that produces it will be equidistant from the vertex on the other side of the vertex from (-1,8), namely (-3, 8).\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "If this is the case, then:\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "Solve this system by your favorite method; either Gaussian Elimination or Cramer's Rule should do. The solution set will give you the three required coefficients.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "If you think your parabola has a horizontal axis, then your third point is (-1, 0), and you will use:\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "to set up your three equations.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "In the absence of any evidence as to the orientation of the axis of symmetry, you might consider doing the problem both ways.\r \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( "\n" ); document.write( "John \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " \n" ); document.write( " |