.
Given:
Room1 : length=4m : width=3m
Room2 : length=6m : width=4m
Tiles:
Glossy1 : 0.5m x 0.5m cost $8/tile
Glossy2 : 1m x 1m cost $10/tile
Non glossy1: 0.5m x 0.5m cost $5/tile
Non glossy2: 1m x 1m cost $7/tile
How to formulate 2 quadratic inequalities involving the dimensions of the floor of the rooms
and the measure and costs of the tiles. Then graph the solution sets of these inequalities.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, this problem does not state, what is the goal of this exercise.
I will suppose that the goal is to find the most cheaper cover of the floor in two rooms.
Comparing the cost of 4 Glossy1 (0.5m x 0.5m at $8) against 1 Glossy2 (1m x 1m at $10),
we see that 1 Glossy2 is cheaper for one (and for each) square meter.
Comparing the cost of 4 non-glossy1 (0.5m x 0.5m at $5) against 1 non-glossy2 (1m x 1m at $7),
we see that 1 non-glossy2 is cheaper for one (and for each) square meter.
Comparing the cost of 1 Glossy2 (1m x 1m at $10) against 1 non-glossy2 (1m x 1m at $7),
we see that 1 non-glossy2 is cheaper for one (and for each) square meter.
So, the cheapest option for all cases and from the point of view of different combinations,
is the choice of non-glossy2 (1m x 1m at $7).
It gives the total cost for the total area of the two rooms (4*3 + 6*4)*7 = 252 dollars.
ANSWER. The cheapest cover for the two room is non-glossy2 (1m x 1m at $7),
giving the total cost of 252 dollars.
Solved mentally.
-----------------
In my view, my interpretation, my approach and my solution transform this
(originally non-sensical) problem in something that makes sense.