SOLUTION: I'm lost - I saw a math tutor today but he got side tracked and I'm just more confused. Here is the problem: Solve the inequality log (base x) 5 < log (base 5) x remember that

Algebra.Com
Question 634548: I'm lost - I saw a math tutor today but he got side tracked and I'm just more confused. Here is the problem:
Solve the inequality log (base x) 5 < log (base 5) x
remember that x>0 and x≠1
rewrite each logarithm in terms of a common base, move both expressions to the same side of the inequality so that everything is being compared with zero. find a common denominator to combine the two expressions. Find the critical values of the combined expression, that is, find the values of x that make the numerator equal 0 and the values of x that make the denominator equal zero, find these values algebraically. I can muddle through some of this but I'm also required to detail out "why" I'm doing each step... I don't know how to describe the how and why in words.

Answer by jsmallt9(3758)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!

You are right in thinking we need a common base, either x or 5 or some third number. Using some third number will work but it makes things more complicated (as you will see shortly), so we will use a common base of x or 5. I'll use x. Using the base conversion formula, to convert the base x log into an expression of base 5 logs:

The numerator of the fraction is equal to 1 (since ) so this will simplify. (This is why using x or 5 as the common base makes things simpler.):


As you indicated we could continue by making one side zero, etc. And I will do this shortly. But this inequality can be solved much more easily if you look at what it is saying and if you understand certain things about how numbers work.

This equality says that some number, , is greater than its reciprocal (1/q is the reciprocal of q). When can a number be less than its reciprocal? If you understand reciprocals well you will know thatSince could be positive or negative, the full solution will come from:
() or ( and )
If this makes sense to you and if you think your teacher will accept this, then skip to "THE FINISH" below where I will finish this. Otherwise, keep reading. I will now solve this by getting one side to be zero, etc.


First let's get rid of the fraction. To do this we will multiply each side by . But we have to careful doing this because this is an inequality, might be negative and if we multiply an inequality by a negative number we must reverse the inequality. To do this correctly we must generate two inequalities, one for when is positive (and we don't reverse the inequality) and one for when is negative (and we do reverse the inequality):
( and ) or ( and )
Making the right side 2nd and 4th inequalities a zero:
( and ) or ( and )
Factoring the 2nd and 4th inequalities (using the difference of squares pattern: ):
( and ) or ( and )

Next I will deal with this in parts. The first "half":
( and )
says that the log is positive and a product of two factors is greater than zero (IOW, positive). (Note: Always read inequalities form where the variable is. The variable in is on the right so we should read it from right to left. And from right to left, "<" is a "greater than".) And how does a product of two numbers become positive? Answer: If both numbers are positive or if both numbers are negative. And since is positive, doesn't have to be positive, too? So we can't have two negative, jsut two positives And since we already know that is positive, then we just have to say that is positive, too. negative! So the first half simplifies to:
( and )
Adding 1 to both sides of the second inequality we get:
( and )
which simplifies to just:
()

Next, let's look at the second "half":
( and )
which says that the log is negative and a product of two numbers is negative. A product of two numbers is negative only when one is positive and the other is negative. Since the log is negative, the factor must be negative, too. So the must be positive:
( and )
Subtracting 1 from both sides of the second inequality we get:
( and )

Putting our simplified "halves" back together we have:
() or ( and )
Note how this is exactly what we got using some logic and our understanding of reciprocals!

THE FINISH

Solving
() or ( and )
Rewriting each of these in exponential form:
() or ( and )
Simplifying:
() or ( and )
This is our solution. Translated: x can be any number larger than 5 or any number between 1/5 and 1.

RELATED QUESTIONS

I am totally lost on this problem, please explain and show the steps. Here is the... (answered by rapaljer)
The directions say: Solve the equation. Check your solution. {{{2m/(m+4) = 3/(m-1)}}} (answered by stanbon,josmiceli)
Hello dear tutor, I need help with a certain math problem today that we just learned in (answered by josmiceli)
i have another solve for the unknown 8/52 = m/39 again i know this is basic math... (answered by blueskyy,Annabelle1)
I need to know how to write this equation in order to find the answer. If I am 48 and my (answered by mananth)
I'm very lost for this question. I tried it by myself and with my friend in math class... (answered by solver91311)
i am to do this math problem and are having a rough time of it and i would like your... (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)
When solving this equation i am lost on the last step.Use the quadratic formula to solve... (answered by Alan3354)
Dear Tutor, Could you please explain the procedure in solving this problem: Let... (answered by Fombitz)