SOLUTION: can anyone help me solve the following log equation: Solve for x: 2^(x-1) = 3^(2x-1)

Algebra.Com
Question 412938: can anyone help me solve the following log equation:
Solve for x:
2^(x-1) = 3^(2x-1)

Answer by jsmallt9(3758)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!

Solving equations where the variable is in an exponent can be done in a couple of ways:
Since 2 and 3 are prime they share no common factors (other than 1) and so it will not be simple to write each side as powers of the same number. So we will use logarithms. Any base of logarithm can be used. However,
Let's look at using base 2 logarithms. Finding the base 2 logarithm of each side we get:

Next we can use a property of logarithms, , which allows us to move an exponent of the argument of a logarithm outr in front. (It is thie very property that is the reason we use logarithms on problems like this. It allows us to move the exponent, where the variable is, to a location where we can now solve for the variable.) Using the property on both sides of the equation we get:

By definition, . (This is why base 2 or base 3 logarithms give us the simplest expression for an answer.) So this becomes:

or just

Now we solve for x. First we simplify the right side, using the Distributive Property:

Next we gather the x terms on one side and the "non-x" terms on the other side of the equation. Subtractin x fron each side and adding we get:

Factoring out x on the right side we get:

And last of all we divide both sides by :

This is an exact expression for the solution to your equation. If you need a decimal approximation, then you a) should have used base 10 or base e logs instead; or b) use the change of base formula to convert the logarithms above into base 10 or base e logarithms.

If we chose base 3 logarithms instead... (The steps are all the same as above except a different logarithm turns out to be 1 so I will not provide explanations.)









If we chose base e logarithms instead... (The steps are all the same as above except no logarithm turns out to be 1 so I will not provide explanations.)







If we chose base 10 logarithms instead we would end up with:


All four solutions, although they look different, are correct and exact expressions for the solution to your equation. The last two, with the base e or base 10 logarithms, are more complex but easier to turn into decimal approximations.

RELATED QUESTIONS

CAN ANYONE HELP ME TO SOLVE THE FOLLOWING PROBLEM? 1/2 + 2/x = 1/3 +... (answered by checkley77)
Can anyone help me solve the following problem? -2< x+1<4 (answered by drk)
Can anyone help me solve {{{ log(x)12 = 3... (answered by addingup,MathTherapy)
Can anyone help me? Solve for x: log(subscript 3) x^9 =... (answered by likaaka)
Hello, I'm trying to solve for x in the following equation: {{{ log( 5,x ) + log(... (answered by stanbon)
can someon help me solve the following rational equation: x+1 over 1 = 3 over... (answered by stanbon)
Can anyone help me solve this problem?... (answered by mangopeeler07,Alan3354,ankor@dixie-net.com)
Can you please help me with solving this problem: Solve the equation for x.... (answered by stanbon)
hello :) hope anyone can help me Solve by using the quadratic equation X=- b+_ sqrt (... (answered by Alan3354,MathLover1)