SOLUTION: I was reading that a 4.7 on the richter earthquake is 32 times worse than a 3.7 event How can that be? Since it is a log scale it would seem that it would be 10 times worse. The
Algebra.Com
Question 1072356: I was reading that a 4.7 on the richter earthquake is 32 times worse than a 3.7 event How can that be? Since it is a log scale it would seem that it would be 10 times worse. The word energy was also used in the question - does that make a difference
Answer by Fombitz(32388) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Richter scale measures amplitude of the event so a whole number change is 10 fold increase in amplitude.
Energy released by an event is a 31.6 fold increase with a whole number change.
So it's apples and oranges.
RELATED QUESTIONS
I read that a 4.7 earthquake was 32 times worse than a 3.7 earthquake. I thought the... (answered by josgarithmetic)
1. The 1933 earthquake in Japan registered 8.9 on the Richter scale. a). What would be... (answered by LinnW)
An aftershock measuring 5.5 on the Richter scale occurred south of Christchurch, New... (answered by Theo)
About how many times more intense is an earthquake that measures 8.4 on the Richter scale (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)
About how many times more intense is an earthquake that measures 8.6 on the Richter scale (answered by Theo)
About how many times more intense is an earthquake that measures 8.1 on the Richter scale (answered by MathLover1)
About how many times more intense is an earthquake that measures 8.1 on the Richter scale (answered by greenestamps)
The intensity levels I of two earthquakes measured on a seismograph can be compared by... (answered by MathLover1)
The intensity levels I of two earthquakes measured on a seismograph can be compared by... (answered by Theo)