SOLUTION: Hi. This is a base arithmetic question. "Is there any base b such that 3443 base b is a prime number? If yes, provide an example. If not, explain why not." I've been stuck for a

Algebra.Com
Question 1203198: Hi. This is a base arithmetic question.
"Is there any base b such that 3443 base b is a prime number? If yes, provide an example. If not, explain why not."
I've been stuck for a while. Any help on how to prove this would be appreciated. Thank you so much!

Found 2 solutions by ikleyn, math_tutor2020:
Answer by ikleyn(52803)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.

This question in the post is nonsensical.

The fact, if the number 3443 is a prime number or not,
does not depend on any "base".

3443 = 11*313, so 3443 is a composite, not a prime number.


A collection of words in the post is "soup of words with no sense" (not edible).


If one wants the meaning of the problem be understandable,
then its formulation (its wording) should be different.



Answer by math_tutor2020(3817)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!

3443 = 11 * 313

This shows 3443 is not prime. It is composite.
It doesn't matter which base you are working with because we can convert between any two bases.
A prime number in one base, is a prime number in any base.

Some examples:



The subscript represents which base we're working in
For instance

Further Reading:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3999/is-a-prime-number-still-a-prime-when-in-a-different-base
and
http://web.archive.org/web/20190714164706/http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/55880.html

Useful calculator
https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/base-converter.html

---------------------------------

Another approach


Use the rational root theorem to determine that b = -1 is a root of
Therefore, (b+1) is a factor

Use polynomial long division, or the shortcut synthetic division, to find that

That rearranges to
For to be prime, one of the factors must be 1.
If b+1 = 1, then b = 0. But we can't have base 0.

If 3b^2+b+3 = 1, then it leads to two nonreal complex roots.
The base cannot be complex as only positive integers are allowed
Specifically from the set {5,6,7,8,9,...} so we can form

We conclude that neither factor (b+1) nor (3b^2+b+3) can be 1.
Therefore, is never prime. It is always composite.

RELATED QUESTIONS

what is the base conversion formula? is it log (base b) a = log (base c) a/log... (answered by sdmmadam@yahoo.com)
For a particular real number a and base b it is known that log(base b)a=2.75. Determine... (answered by lwsshak3)
Hi, I'd really appreciate any help. My question is: Suppose log(base b)2=a and log(base... (answered by mohammadrezai)
Using a calculator, find log 1000 where log means log to the base of 10. Answer: b) (answered by longjonsilver)
Please help I am stuck on this one, Most calculators have 2 different logs on them:... (answered by Nate)
Dear Sir I would be glad if you can help me to resolve the below problems that has been (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)
The question asks: "The 2 digit number AB, with A not equal to 0, represents a prime if... (answered by richard1234)
Please provide an example of this question: What is the effect on the area of a triangle... (answered by Earlsdon)
Most calculators have 2 different logs on them: log, which is base 10, and 1n, which is... (answered by fractalier)