SOLUTION: sin 4theta=8sin theta*cos^3theta-4sin theta*cos theta
Algebra.Com
Question 613913: sin 4theta=8sin theta*cos^3theta-4sin theta*cos theta
Answer by jsmallt9(3758) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
On the left the only argument is . On the right the only argument is . So at some point we will need to change the argument of into . Also, the only function on the left is sin while the right has sin and cos. The left side has only one term while the right side has two. These are the kinds of things to look at when trying to prove these identities.
Changing arguments and functions is usually done with Trig. properties/identities. Changing the number of terms can be done with algebra and/or with Trig. properties/identities.
So which properties could we use on ? Answering this depends on:- A good knowledge of the various properties
- An understanding that these properties represent patterns, that the x's, the A's and the B's in all those formulas are just place holders. If every "x" in a formula is replaced by the same number, variable or expression, then the equation is just as true as it was when it was just "x". The same can be said for the A's and B's. For example:
cos(A+B) = cos(A)cos(B) - sin(A)sin(B)
If we replace the A's with "q" and the B's with 10q we get:
cos(q+10q) = cos(q)cos(10q) - sin(q)sin(10q) - An ability to imagine ways to rewrite what you have so it matches a pattern from one of the properties. For example, if you had cos(11q) can you see that it would be the same as cos(q+10q)? If yes, then we could use that, and the example above to transform cos(11q):
cos(11q) = cos(q+10q) = cos(q)cos(10q) - sin(q)sin(10q)
So which properties can we use on ? There are many possibilities, some better than others:
Now we could use the sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) property:
Now we can use the sin(A+B) = sin(A)cos(B) + coa(A)sin(B) property:
Now we can use the sin(A+B) = sin(A)cos(B) + coa(A)sin(B) property:
Now we can use the sin(A-B) = sin(A)cos(B) - coa(A)sin(B) property:
- on which we can use the property:
(Note: Algebra.com's formula software will not let me use a "plus or minua" symbol without a number (or variable) in front of it. That is why the 0's are there. They are mathematically unnecessary.)
One could go on forever with this. We just need to find one that looks promising. We are trying to change the argument from to . So the last two examples above look very unpromising because they end up with arguments that are larger that , not smaller. The first three could work. The 3rd one has an argument of while the first two have arguments of . To me, the first one looks simplest and easiest to work with. So we'll start with:
We're still working our way down to arguments of just . It should be obvious how to deal with :
which simplifies to:
But for there are three variations of the cos(2x) formula:So which one do we use? Well any of them will work ultimately. But a smart choice here will make the work easier. Let's look at our expression using each of three variations of cos(2x):
or
or
All of these will work but which is best? Well the 1st and 3rd ones have in them. Out final expression, does not have any 's.
So let's try the middle option:
We can use the Distributive Property to multiply this out:
which happens to be the expression we want!
RELATED QUESTIONS
Show that
(a) sin 2theta * cos theta + cos 2theta * sin theta = sin 4theta * cos theta (answered by mccravyedwin)
sin theta + cos theta = cos 2... (answered by fractalier)
Prove or disprove without a calculator.
(sin theta/csc 2theta)-(cos 2theta/sec theta)=... (answered by solver91311)
If sin theta - cos theta =0 then the value of (sin^4theta + cos^4 theta)is... (answered by ikleyn)
solve cos theta = sin theta ( theta + 30 )
(answered by ikleyn)
simplify sin theta/cos theta tan... (answered by josgarithmetic)
csc theta - sin theta/1+cos theta = cot... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
prove that cot (theta) cos (theta)=csc (theta)- sin (theta)
(answered by lwsshak3)
sec(theta)-cos(theta)=sin(theta)tan(theta) (answered by Alan3354)