.
The solution by the tutor @Fombitz relates to ANOTHER problem,
when the given distances are the distances to the SIDES of an equilateral triangle.
For that problem the solution is correct, BUT NOT FOR THE GIVEN problem.
Below I will try to analyze the problem. I got some equation for the unknown side length of the equilateral triangle.
But this equation is very complicated and does not allow analytical "exact" solution.
Nevertheless, it does allow to get some estimation for the solution, at least.
Before to start analyze, I made quick search in the Internet.
I didn't find the solution there. I found only some attempts to solve the problem, but these attempts did not go far.
It looks like that this problem is considered by those few people who tried solve it as unsolved and as not having direct,
simple, clear, elementary and straightforward solution.
Let x be the unknown side length under the question.
Let ABC be the given equilateral triangle, and let P be that point inside.
1. For the triangle APC with the sides 3 and 4 cm and the angle = < APC we have from the cosine law
= , or = , so = and then
= = . (1)
2. For the triangle BPC with the sides 3 and 5 cm and the angle = < BPC we have from the cosine law
= , or = , so = and then
= = . (2)
3. For the triangle APB with the sides 4 and 5 cm and the angle = < APB we have from the cosine law
= , or = , so = and then
= = . (3)
4. Next, the area of the triangle APC is = . (4)
The area of the triangle BPC is = . (5)
The area of the triangle APB is = . (6)
5. Now I can make an equation by equating the area of the large triangle to the sum of the areas of small triangles
= + + , or, which is the same
= + + .
6. It is the equation I talked about before to start my solution.
I will try to solve it graphically.
Plot y = (red) and y = + + (green)
I made also estimation for the root "x" using Excel in my computer and got x between 6.76 and 6.77: 6.76 < x < 6.77.
I invite and ask other tutors who has "a technology" in their hands to make their more precise estimations.
=========================
Great , @greenestamps ! ! !
Your solution is Excellent !
=========================