SOLUTION: Hi, I need to solve for "F" in the following equation: P = L + (SQ)/F the first step I did to isolate F was to move the L, P-L = (SQ)/F then do I multiply both sides by 1

Question 546335: Hi, I need to solve for "F" in the following equation:
P = L + (SQ)/F
the first step I did to isolate F was to move the L,
P-L = (SQ)/F
then do I multiply both sides by 1/SQ to clear the fractions?
Thank you for your help.
Lynn
Answer by stanbon(75887) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
solve for "F" in the following equation:
P = L + (SQ)/F
the first step I did to isolate F was to move the L,
P-L = (SQ)/F
---
Invert both sides to get:
F/(SQ) = 1/(P-L)
---
Multiply by SQ to get:
F = (SQ)/(P-L)
===================
Cheers,
Stan H.
RELATED QUESTIONS
When using rules of implication for natural deduction, how would I get to my next steps... (answered by Edwin McCravy)

I have a question. I have to solve for "l" I know that I need to isolate "l" but i do not (answered by stanbon)

I need to solve for L... (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)

I need help constructing an indirect proof using reductio ad absurdum for: ~S → (F... (answered by Edwin McCravy)

Solve the following: 1.P = 2l + 2w, for l 2.C = 5/9(F - 32), for F (answered by math_helper)

solve the proof ~F > ~G, P > ~Q, ~F v P, (~G v ~Q) > (L • M), therefore,... (answered by Edwin McCravy)

if l want to solve an equation 11x+y=625, i plot the graph of the function... (answered by Alan3354)

I. Use an ordinary proof (not conditional or indirect) to solve the following arguments. (answered by CPhill)

0. Tell your classmates about your pet to set up the scenario for fencing a rectangle in (answered by solver91311)