SOLUTION: It is not a system, I can not find anything, anywhere that is just solving one nonlinear equation. x/(x+1)>3x 1. Work the problem 2. Set to zero and factor. 3. Find zer

Algebra.Com
Question 1152325: It is not a system, I can not find anything, anywhere that is just solving one nonlinear equation.
x/(x+1)>3x
1. Work the problem
2. Set to zero and factor.
3. Find zeros.
4. Find intervals.
5. Test intervals.
6. Write answer in interval notation and graph.

Found 2 solutions by MathLover1, ikleyn:
Answer by MathLover1(20849)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!

1. Work the problem


...add to both sides

......switch sides




2. Set to zero and factor.


3. Find zeros.
...this will be equal to zero if or
so, zeros are:

=>=>
4. Find intervals.

5. Test intervals.
let say




-> which is true
6. Write answer in interval notation and graph.
(,)


MSP96.gif


MSP144.gif

Answer by ikleyn(52778)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
.

Below is the plot of two functions,   y =  (in red)   and   y = 3x  (in green).

The problem is to find where the red line is above the green line.

    


    Plot y =   (red)  and  y = 3x (green).

From the plot, it is clear that the solution is the union of TWO intervals:

        one interval is semi-infinite (,)   and the other interval is somewhere between -1 and 0.

The solution by @MathLover1 gives only the second interval and entirely misses the first semi-infinite interval.

So,  her solution is  INCORRECT.   Therefore,  I came to bring the correct solution.

After completing my solution,  I will point the error in the MathLover1' solution.


So, we start from the given inequality

     > 3x.       (1)


Move 3x to the left side

     - 3x > 0


Write with the common denominator

     -  > 0


Make equivalent transformations

     > 0

     > 0

     > 0

     > 0


Multiply both sides by (-1) and change the inequality sign

     < 0.


Divide by 3 both sides

     < 0.      (2)


So, our original inequality is equivalent to the inequality (2).

Now I will solve the inequality (2).


The factors in inequality (2) have three critical points, where linear terms become equal to zero and change the sign.

These points are  -1,    and  0.


The critical points divide the entire number line in four intervals

    1)  (,),   2)  (,),   3)   (,)  and   4)  [,).



In the interval #1, all three linear factors are negative, so the entire rational function is negative.

Thus the entire interval  (,)  IS the solution to inequality (2) and, hence, for the original inequality, too.



In the interval #2, the linear factor  (x+1)  is positive, while two other factors are negative, 
so the entire rational function is positive.

Thus the interval  (,)  is NOT the solution to inequality (2) and, hence, is NOT the solution for the original inequality.



In the interval #3, the linear factors  (x+1)  and    are both positive, while third factor  x   is negative, 
so the entire rational function is negative.

Thus the interval  (,)  IS the solution to inequality (2) and, hence, IS the solution for the original inequality.



In the interval #4, all three linear factors  are positive, so the entire rational function in (2) is positive.

Thus the interval  [,)  is NOT the solution to inequality (2) and, hence, is not the solution for the original inequality.



ANSWER.  The solution set for the given inequality is the union of two intervals  (,) U (,).


Please notice and pay special attention that all endpoints are treated correctly in my solution and in my answer.


The problem is solved,  and solved correctly.

The way on how I solved it,  is a  STANDARD  (but not a unique)  way solving such inequalities for rational functions.

-----------

Now,  I promised to show where is the error in the solution by @MathLover1.

It is in the  4-th line of her post,  where she multiplies both sides of the inequality by the factor  (x+1)
without analyzing the sign of this factor.

Doing in this way,  she gets  NON-EQUIVALENT  inequality and comes to the wrong resulting answer.


It is very common error in solving such inequalities for rational functions - so, be aware (!)


At this point,  I completed my post.

From it,  learn on how to solve similar problems correctly.

-----------------

If you want to see many other similar solved problems,  look into the lessons
    - Solving inequalities for rational functions with numerator and denominator factored into a product of linear binomials
    - Solving inequalities for rational functions with non-zero right side
in this site.

Consider these lessons as your handbook, textbook, tutorials and (free of charge) home teacher.



RELATED QUESTIONS

I was helping a friend with her trig homework and we both got stuck on this one problem.... (answered by nyc_function)
How come and forgive me for saying, Why are there not andy function solutions? I have... (answered by Mathtut)
I need help solving the following nonlinear system of equation: y = x^2 3x = y... (answered by stanbon)
So I have a basic question about slope intercept. This is an equation in my book that I'm (answered by josgarithmetic)
solve the system by substitution. 1. x+y=-7 x=y+19 show step by step work please (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)
Solve the following nonlinear equation algebraically. (NOTE: even though these equations... (answered by oscargut)
I have the following problem. I will be honest, it is for homework, so the answer is not... (answered by stanbon,ankor@dixie-net.com,Fombitz)
Find an application for your chosen field--- which is psychology or really anything-- or (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)
I might not have the topic exactly right, but I have an issue. This assignment was due... (answered by josgarithmetic,Edwin McCravy,MathLover1,ikleyn)