No, Ikleyn, I'm not being a troll. Here are two perfectly correct logical
patterns that give the same four numbers but which produce different
5th numbers. I am doing this to point out something VERY CORRECT that
YOU and another tutor SAID about such problems. Their answers are not unique.
Unfortunately, aptitude tests for getting jobs very often include number
sequences such as this one. I know from personal experience from my younger
years when applying for employment. That's why we should take them seriously.
Maybe to PROTEST AGAINST them! Or else to hopefully get educators to study such
number sequence problems given on such job exams. Somebody should investigate
what is going on with these sequence problems on tests for people interviewing
for jobs. If there are specific types of patterns for them that are required to
answer them, these should be taught in schools.
I made a mistake on the lst one so I deleted it. I had a different one, decided
to change it and forgot to change the numbers in the 5th part. Here is the
corrected version, plus another one below that gives the same results using a
cubic equation in n.
First one (with the numbers corrected in the last step):
Start with 5.
Take the absolute difference between 5 and 9, get 4.
Square 4, get 16, add 26, get 42, divide by 3, get 14.
Take the absolute difference between 14 and 9, get 5.
Square 5, get 25, add 26, get 51, divide by 3, get 17.
Take the absolute difference between 17 and 9, get 8.
Square 8, get 64, add 26, get 90, divide by 3, get 30.
Take the absolute difference between 30 and 9, get 21.
Square 21, get 441, add 26, get 467, divide by 3, get 155 2/3.
Answer 155 2/3.
Second one:
You can also substitute integers 1 through 4 in the following cubic polynomial
in n and get the same 4 numbers you gave.
Substituting 1:
Substituting 2:
Substituting 3:
Substituting 4:
Substituting 5:
Answer: 69
Edwin