SOLUTION: I've been stuck on this one for hours, any help would be super appreciated! Use an ordinary proof (not conditional or indirect proof): 1. ~N > (~R > C) 2. R

SOLUTION: I've been stuck on this one for hours, any help would be super appreciated! Use an ordinary proof (not conditional or indirect proof): 1. ~N > (~R > C) 2. R > N 3. ~C // N

Question 869791: I've been stuck on this one for hours, any help would be super appreciated!
Use an ordinary proof (not conditional or indirect proof):
1. ~N > (~R > C)
2. R > N
3. ~C // N
Answer by jim_thompson5910(35256) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!

1.  ~N > (~R > C)
2.  R > N
3.  ~C // N
-------------------------------------------------------
4.  (~N & ~R) > C                        1      Exportation
5.  (~N & ~R) > ~(~C)                    4      Double Negation
6.  ~(~N & ~R)                           5,3    Modus Tollens
7.  ~(~N) v ~(~R)                        6      De Morgan's Law
8.  ~(~N) v R                            7      Double Negation
9.  ~N > R                               8      Material Implication
10. ~N > N                               9,2    Hypothetical Syllogism
11. ~(~N) v N                            10     Material Implication
12. N v N                                11     Double Negation
13. N                                    12     Tautology

RELATED QUESTIONS
Hi. This is a base arithmetic question. "Is there any base b such that 3443 base b is a (answered by ikleyn,math_tutor2020)

Using an ordinary proof (not a conditional or indirect proof) (answered by richwmiller)

Hello team, would you be so kind to assist with this problem below. I�ve tried to figure... (answered by Edwin McCravy)

Very confused with this proof, any help would be appreciated!! Conditional Proof - can... (answered by jim_thompson5910)

Here is the second one I need help with. The probability that San Francisco plays in... (answered by edjones)

Find an application for your chosen field--- which is psychology or really anything-- or (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)

Use an ordinary proof (not conditional or indirect) to solve the following arguments. (answered by RBryant)

Hi I am stuck on this one which has me completely bamboozled. Your assistance would be... (answered by solver91311,stanbon)

Using an ordinary proof (not a conditional or indirect proof) 1. S ⊃ (K ⋅... (answered by richwmiller)