SOLUTION: I am just so confused! Here's the problem.
I am supposed to derive the following problem: {(G > J) & [(~K > ~H) & (G v H]} > (J v K)
Algebra.Com
Question 668485: I am just so confused! Here's the problem.
I am supposed to derive the following problem: {(G > J) & [(~K > ~H) & (G v H]} > (J v K)
Answer by MathLover1(20849) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
I guess here (G > J) you mean (G => J)
if so, here is your answer:
W3C Web site
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/43/capture1018201223410pm.jpg/
RELATED QUESTIONS
Solve the two step proofs below:
1. ~C
2. A > B
3. B > C / ~A
1. D > E
2. F > G
(answered by Edwin McCravy)
How would you prove this argument valid ?
1. A > H
2. G > S
3. ~ K > (A v G)
4. ~ K (answered by math_helper)
I am not grasping how to do this problem. Please help.
U{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}... (answered by MathLover1)
1. (R v S) > (H & ~G)
2. (K v R) > (G v ~H) / ~R
(answered by jim_thompson5910)
(G&H)>(J<>L)
G<>H
(H&~L)v(H&K)
Conclusion: J>K
Can somebody please help me with... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
I have started the following proof but am not sure how to finish. thanks!
1. G>(H>K)
2. (answered by jim_thompson5910)
Quadratic Functions and Equations
The first question I gave it go at.
Solve.... (answered by richwmiller,solver91311)
I am working with sets. My sets are as follows:
U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k,... (answered by solver91311)
I am having trouble solving the following propositional logic proofs.
1. Conclusion:... (answered by jim_thompson5910)