I will assume your teacher will allow you to use Material implication (P ⊃ Q) ≡ (~P ∨ Q), which is easily proved by with a simple 4-line truth table. 1. (A ⊃ B) • (C ⊃ D) // (A • C) ⊃ (B • D) 2. (~A ∨ B) • (~C ∨ D) 1, Material implication 3. ~A ∨ B 2, Simplification 4. (~C ∨ D) • (~A ∨ B) 2, Commutation 5. ~C ∨ D) 4, Simplification 6. (~C ∨ D) ∨ ~A 5, Addition 7. ~C ∨ (D ∨ ~A) 6, Association 8. (D ∨ ~A) ∨ ~C 7, Commutation 9. (~A ∨ D) ∨ ~C 8, Commutation 10. (~A ∨ B) ∨ ~C 3, Addition 11. [(~A ∨ B) ∨ ~C] • [(~A ∨ D) ∨ ~C] 10,9, Conjunction 12. [(~A ∨ B) • (~A ∨ D)] ∨ ~C 11, Distribution 13. [~A ∨ (B • D)] ∨ ~C 12, Distribution 14. ~A ∨ [(B • D) ∨ ~C] 13, Association 15. ~A ∨ [~C ∨ (B • D)] 14, Commutation 16. [~A ∨ ~C] ∨ (B • D) 15, Association 17. ~(A • C) ∨ (B • D) 16, DeMorgan's law 18. (A • C) ⊃ (B • D) 17, Material implication If he or she will not allow you to use Material Implication, then re-post saying so. Edwin