SOLUTION: Use rules of implication to derive the indicated conclusions.
1. R ⊃ (G v ~A) 2. (G v ~A) ⊃ ~S 3. G ⊃ S 4. R/~A
1. ~N⊃ [(B ⊃ D) ⊃(N v~E)] 2. (B ⊃ E) ⊃ ~N 3. B
Algebra.Com
Question 1201675: Use rules of implication to derive the indicated conclusions.
1. R ⊃ (G v ~A) 2. (G v ~A) ⊃ ~S 3. G ⊃ S 4. R/~A
1. ~N⊃ [(B ⊃ D) ⊃(N v~E)] 2. (B ⊃ E) ⊃ ~N 3. B ⊃ D 4. D ⊃ E / ~D
1. ~M ⊃ Q 2. R ⊃ ~T 3. ~M v R / Q v ~T
Answer by math_tutor2020(3816) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
I'll do problem 1 to get you started.
This is what the 1st question looks like when each premise gets its own line.
1. R ⊃ (G v ~A)
2. (G v ~A) ⊃ ~S
3. G ⊃ S
4. R
:. ~A
Here is one way to do the derivation.
Number | Statement | Lines Used | Reason |
1 | R -> (G v ~A) | | |
2 | (G v ~A) -> ~S | | |
3 | G -> S | | |
4 | R | | |
:. | ~A | | |
5 | R -> ~S | 1,2 | Hypothetical Syllogism |
6 | ~S | 5,4 | Modus Ponens |
7 | G v ~A | 1,4 | Modus Ponens |
8 | ~G | 3,6 | Modus Tollens |
9 | ~A | 7,8 | Disjunctive Syllogism |
I used arrows in place of the horseshoe symbols.
For more information, check out the various rules of inference and rules of replacement as shown in the link below.
https://logiccurriculum.com/2019/02/09/rules-for-proofs/
Similar logic questions
https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Proofs/Proofs.faq.question.1198762.html
https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Proofs/Proofs.faq.question.1193810.html
https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Proofs/Proofs.faq.question.1194113.html
RELATED QUESTIONS
A. Use the first thirteen rules of inference to derive the conclusions of the following... (answered by CPhill)
A. Use the first thirteen rules of inference to derive the conclusions of the following... (answered by CPhill)
I can only use the 8 implicational rules
1. (A v ~B) >(F v (R . G))
2. A
3. F > L
4. (answered by jim_thompson5910)
Use the first eight implication rules to create a proof of the following argument.
1. B... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
Derive: A v ~B
1.(F v G) v (A v ~B)
2. F>A
3.... (answered by jim_thompson5910)
1. (F . M) > (S v T) 2. (~S v A) > F 3. (~S v B) > M 4. ~S . G / T (answered by jim_thompson5910)
Looking for a logical proof help using rules of implication! Thank you!
1. [(T • R) v (answered by Edwin McCravy)
solve plz? with rules of inference and replacement...
1. (~D + A) v (~D + R)
2. D v... (answered by math_tutor2020)
Construct a proof using any basic rules and replacement rules.
1.(A v F) horseshoe ~(B • (answered by Edwin McCravy)