SOLUTION: INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Prove this using natural deduction. NOTE: Use * for dot, v for wedge, ~ for tilde, = for triple ba

Algebra.Com
Question 1179696: INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem.
Prove this using natural deduction.
NOTE: Use * for dot, v for wedge, ~ for tilde, = for triple bar (or copy and paste ≡), and > for horseshoe (or copy and paste ⊃ )

1. N ≡ F
2. ~F v ~N
3. D ⊃ N ~(F v D)

1. (B ⊃ G) • (F ⊃ N)
2. ~(G * N) / ~(B * F)

1. (J • R) ⊃ H
2. (R ⊃ H) ⊃ M
3. ~(P v ~J) / M • ~P

1. (F • H) ⊃ N
2 F v S
3. H / N v S
Please any guidance on these 4 questions I'd greatly appreciate it!

Answer by CPhill(1959)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Let's solve these natural deduction proofs step-by-step:
1. Proof:
N ≡ F
~F v ~N
D ⊃ N / ~(F v D)
Proof:
(N ⊃ F) * (F ⊃ N) (1, Equivalence)
N ⊃ F (4, Simplification)
F ⊃ N (4, Simplification)
~N ⊃ ~F (5, Contraposition)
~F ⊃ ~N (6, Contraposition)
~N v ~F (7, Implication)
~N (2, 9, Resolution)
~D (3, 10, Modus Tollens)
~F (8, 10, Modus Ponens)
~F * ~D (11, 12, Conjunction)
~(F v D) (13, De Morgan's)
Therefore, ~(F v D) is proven.
2. Proof:
(B ⊃ G) * (F ⊃ N)
~(G * N) / ~(B * F)
Proof:
B ⊃ G (1, Simplification)
F ⊃ N (1, Simplification)
~G v ~N (2, De Morgan's)
~B v G (3, Implication)
~F v N (4, Implication)
~B v ~N (5, 6, Resolution)
~F v ~G (5, 7, Resolution)
~B (8, 9, Resolution)
~F (8, 10, Resolution)
~B * ~F (10, 11, Conjunction)
~(B * F) (12, De Morgan's)
Therefore, ~(B * F) is proven.
3. Proof:
(J * R) ⊃ H
(R ⊃ H) ⊃ M
~(P v ~J) / M * ~P
Proof:
~P * ~~J (3, De Morgan's)
~P (4, Simplification)
~~J (4, Simplification)
J (6, Double Negation)
~(J * ~R) (1, Implication)
~J v ~R (8, De Morgan's)
~R (7, 9, Disjunctive Syllogism)
R ⊃ H (1, Exportation)
M (2, 11, Modus Ponens)
M * ~P (5, 12, Conjunction)
Therefore, M * ~P is proven.
4. Proof:
(F * H) ⊃ N
F v S
H / N v S
Proof:
~F v N (1, Exportation)
F (2, Assumption)
N (4, 5, Disjunctive Syllogism)
N v S (6, Addition)
S (2, Assumption)
N v S (8, Addition)
H (3, Copy)
F * H (5, 10, Conjunction)
N (1, 11, Modus Ponens)
N v S (12, Addition)
N v S (5-7, 8-9, 13, Conditional Proof)
Therefore, N v S is proven.

RELATED QUESTIONS

INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Prove... (answered by RBryant)
Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Use natural... (answered by math_helper,Bogz)
I could really use some help. Thank You INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive... (answered by CPhill)
Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Use an ordinary... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Use conditional proof (answered by jim_thompson5910)
Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in each problem. Use conditional... (answered by math_tutor2020)
INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in the following problems. (answered by AnlytcPhil)
INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in the following problems. (answered by jim_thompson5910)
INSTRUCTIONS: Use natural deduction to derive the conclusion in the following problems. (answered by jim_thompson5910)