Create proof for the following argument 1. (H ∨ M) ∨ L 2. L ⊃ H 3. H ⊃ (M ⊃ H) 4. ∼(M ⊃ H) /M 5. ~(~M ∨ H) 4, material implication 6. ~~M • ~H 5, deMorgan's law 7. M • ~H 6, double negation 8. M 7, simplification Notice that in this argument, we did not need to use the first three premises but only the fourth. Edwin