She assumed that
"If n is odd, then both (n-1) and (n+1) are even, i.e. are multiples
of 2."
I agree with that without proof. However when she says:
"Moreover, one of these two is a multiple of 4."
although that is true, I think it must be proved before she can use it
legitimately.
I do an induction proof:
Since n is odd, let n = 2m+1 where m is any integer
Then we have to prove that:
then 8m^3+12m^2+4m}}} is a multiple of 24 for any integer m
If m=1
4(1)(1+1)(2*1+1) = 4(2)(2+1) = 4(2)(3) = 24
and 24 is a multiple of 24.
Assume that m=k is such that = 24 times some integer,
Now we consider . When we expand that
out we get
The first parenthetical expression is what we assumed was a multiple of 24
and the second parenthetical expression is a multiple if 24 and the sum
of two multiples of 24 is a multiple of 24.
Thus the theorem is proved by induction.
Edwin