.
a survey of 220 families showed that:
63 had a dog; 64 had a cat; 28 had a dog and a cat;
84 neither had a cat nor a dog and in addition did not have a parakeet;
6 had a cat, a dog and a parakeet.
how many families had a parakeet only?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have a universal set of 220 families and three its basic subsets
d of 63 families having a dog;
c of 64 families having a cat;
p of unknown number of families having a parakeet.
The number of families in the union (d U c) is 63 + 64 - 28 = 99.
The set of families that neither have a cat nor a dog is the complement to the set (d U c),
and the number of such families is 220 - 99 = 121.
We are told, that the number of families that "in addition" do not have parakeet is 84.
From it, we conclude that 121-84 = 37 families do have a parakeet, but have neither a cat nor a dog.
So, the answer to the problem's question is 37 families.
Solved.
================
Notice that the last condition in the post
"6 had a cat, a dog and a parakeet. "
is excessive and unnecessary. I did not use it in my solution.
This problem is DEFINITELY not to write and/or to use Venn diagram
and accompanied system of linear equations in 8 unknowns.
This problem's true destination and true purpose is to solve it MENTALLY
and to teach young students to think logically about the sets and their subsets.