The possible rational roots/zeros of are:
+1, +3, +13, +39
Using synthetic division to test these we will find that only one of these, 3, is actually a zero:
3 | 1 -7 10 26 -47 -39
---- 3 -12 -6 60 39
------------------------------
1 -4 -2 20 13 0
Not only does the zero in the lower right indicate that 3 is a zero (and (x-3) is a factor) but the rest of the bottom row tells us the other factor. The "1 -4 -2 20 13" translates into . So
As mentioned earlier, none of the other possible rational roots/zeros work. And, if "given that x = 3+ 2i" is supposed to indicate that 3+2i is also a zero, then this is an error. 3+2i is not a zero of f(x)! It is was, then 3-2i would also be a zero. And if they were both zeros then and would be factors of f(x). And since , would also be a factor of f(x). And if were a factor of f(x) then it would divide evenly into f(x). But it does not!! So either there is an error in what you posted or I am misinterpreting "given that x = 3+ 2i".
In summary:- x = 3 is the only zero we can find.
- 3+2i (and 3-2i) are not zeros of f(x).
P.S. The only way I know to find approximations for the remaining 4 zeros would be to- Use a graphing calculator to graph f(x) (or )
- Use the trace function to find approximations for where the graph crosses the x-axis.