.
Square SQUR has sides of length x. If triangle SQE is equilateral, find the area of triangle QAU.
Link to diagram: https://ibb.co/C58rZ09R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The solution in the post by @CPhill is INCORRECT.
I came to bring a correct solution.
I will use coordinate plane (x,y). To avoid missing coordinate x with the side length of the square,
I will use 'a' for the square side length.
Let's place the origin of the coordinate system (x,y) at point S.
The line EQ has an equation
y = (1)
since its slope is, obviously, . To find 'b' in this equation, substitute coordinates of
the vertex Q = {a,0) of the square into this equation
0 = .
It gives b = . So, equation of the line EQ is
y = = . (2)
We want to find the point A as the intersection of the line SU and the line EQ.
The line SU has the equation y = -x; so, we substitute y = -x into equation (2). It gives
-x = ,
or
-x = ,
= ,
x = .
Thus we know now the x-coordinate of the point A.
So, now we can find the height h of the triangle QAU as the difference a-x:
h = a-x = a - = = .
You can rationalize the denominator
h = = = .
Now the area of the triangle QAU is half the product of its base 'a' by its height h =
The ANSWER is : the area of the triangle QAU is
= = .
Solved.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Regarding the post by @CPhill . . .
Keep in mind that @CPhill is a pseudonym for the Google artificial intelligence.
The artificial intelligence is like a baby now. It is in the experimental stage
of development and can make mistakes and produce nonsense without any embarrassment.
It has no feeling of shame - it is shameless.
This time, again, it made an error.
Although the @CPhill' solution are copy-paste Google AI solutions, there is one essential difference.
Every time, Google AI makes a note at the end of its solutions that Google AI is experimental
and can make errors/mistakes.
All @CPhill' solutions are copy-paste of Google AI solutions, with one difference:
@PChill never makes this notice and never says that his solutions are copy-past that of Google.
So, he NEVER SAYS TRUTH.
Every time, @CPhill embarrassed to tell the truth.
But I am not embarrassing to tell the truth, as it is my duty at this forum.
And the last my comment.
When you obtain such posts from @CPhill, remember, that NOBODY is responsible for their correctness,
until the specialists and experts will check and confirm their correctness.
Without it, their reliability is ZERO and their creadability is ZERO, too.