Solved by pluggable solver: Solve the System of Equations by Graphing |
Let's look at the first equation --------- Let's look at the second equation --------- So our new system of equations is: In order to graph these equations, we need to solve for y for each equation. So let's solve for y on the first equation Now lets graph So let's solve for y on the second equation Now lets add the graph of From the graph, we can see that the two lines intersect at the point ( |
Your system can be read in this way ((3/4)x + (1/2)y = 5, (-1/4)x - (3/2)y = 1, or in this way 3/(4x) + 1/(2y) = 5, -1/(4x) - 3/(2y) = 1, depending on how to put PARENTHESES into equations. So, the way you presented the problem is AMBIGOUS. To avoid ambiguity, YOU must put parentheses in your formula BEFORE POSTING IT TO THE FORUM.
That's the most inefficient, most time-consuming, and most error-prone method I've ever seen one use to solve a system of equations,
if I ever saw one. It is so inefficient and CONFUSING to the point where the woman who solved it got WRONG solutions. Her solutions
DO NOT SATISFY THE EQUATIONS, so IGNORE HER ENTIRE SOLUTION. Plus, why would someone even try to solve a fractional system by graphing? RIDICULOUS!
I assume the system is:------ eq (i)
---- eq (ii)
Just multiply eq (ii) by 3 to get:---- eq (iii)
Adding eqs (i) & (iii) results in:
- 4y = 8
Substitute - 2 for y in any of the original equations and you should get:
That's all! Nothing more, nothing less!!