SOLUTION: u=64.9t-660 (11<t<14) explain why the terms -660 does not imply that there were ever a negative number of twitter users at the start of 2000

Algebra.Com
Question 1047368: u=64.9t-660 (11 explain why the terms -660 does not imply that there were ever a negative number of twitter users at the start of 2000

Answer by KMST(5328)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
is a linear, always increasing function of .
If = the year as we know it,
would be negative
when <---> .
That would be in the year 10,
and before that time,
but there was no twitter then.

RELATED QUESTIONS

A fishing trawler has radioed the Coast Guard for a helicopter to pick up an injured crew (answered by stanbon,jim_thompson5910)
What is the gradient of the straight line represented by the following equation? u =... (answered by Alan3354,Cromlix)
The number of cattle on a farm is 660. This is a 10% decrease in the number of cows, a... (answered by greenestamps)
Gradient of a straight line represented by the equation... (answered by MathLover1)
A total of 660 nachos and popcorn were sold at the theater. If the theater sold twice as... (answered by ikleyn)
given f(x) is a factor of P(x); suppose that f(2) =0. does that imply that P(2)=0? why... (answered by jsmallt9)
u = 64.9 x 11 - 660 (11 ≤ 11 ≤ 14) (answered by ikleyn)
Can the sample variance ever be a negative number? If so, for what types of data? If not, (answered by Edwin McCravy)
Explain why having a significant linear correlation does not imply causality. Give an... (answered by solver91311)