SOLUTION: How would I answer this proof? Given: <1 and <2 are supplementary.
Prove: m is perallel to n
Algebra.Com
Question 543090: How would I answer this proof? Given: <1 and <2 are supplementary.
Prove: m is perallel to n
Answer by solver91311(24713) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
No idea. I can't see your diagram, so I don't know what relationship the two angles and the two lines have to each other.
John
My calculator said it, I believe it, that settles it
RELATED QUESTIONS
given: <3 and <5 are supplementary; <1 and <5 are supplementary
prove: <1 is congruent... (answered by )
Hello
First of all in advance I thank you for the help you give me!
Okay so here is... (answered by solver91311,MathLover1)
given that <1 and <5 are supplementary. prove that m is parallel to... (answered by Alan3354,stanbon)
Please help me with this proof
Given: <1 and<2 are supplementary, and <3 and<4 are... (answered by solver91311)
How would i solve a proof like this?
Given: Segment PQ is perpendicular to segment QR.
(answered by ikleyn)
complete the two column proof
given: angle 2 and angle 5 are supplementary
prove: L ||... (answered by solver91311)
Complete the following proof.
Given:
l | | m
Prove:
<1, <2 are... (answered by richard1234)
Can you please show me how to write a two-coloumn proof for this:
Given:<1 and <2 form (answered by richard1234)
how do you make a two column proof with the following information.
given: angle 1 and... (answered by richard1234)
