.
Which of the following conditions ensures that triangles ABC and DEF are similar? Select all that apply.
(1) A = B, D = C, F = E, B = A, AB/AD = BC/BE
(2) A = D, AB/EF = BC/DE
(3) AB perp CD, DE perp AE, AB = DE and BC = BD
(4) AB parallel to BC, AB parallel to AC, CA parallel to FD
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The analysis by @CPhill in part (1) is incorrect and his conclusion
for this part is incorrect, too.
Indeed, A = B means that triangle ABC is isosceles with congruent angles A and B at its base.
Next, F = E means that triangle DEF is isosceles with congruent angles F and E at its base.
The condition D = C means that the angles D and C in these two triangles, ABC and DEF,
opposite to their bases AB and FE, are congruent.
So, the triangles ABC and DEF are similar due to the AAA-test.
That is true that the vertices of these triangles are listed in non-canonic order.
The canonic order should be consistent, like ABC and EFD,
but this does not interfere for triangles ABC and DEF (or ABC and EFD) to be similar.
The last imposed condition in (1), AB/AD = BC/BE is not relevant to their similarity,
but does not contradict to it.
The similarity of triangles ABC and FED is provided by the conditions on congruency their corresponding angles.
So again, in part (1), the analysis and the conclusion by @CPhill are incorrect.
.
Which of the following conditions ensures that triangles ABC and DEF are similar? Select all that apply.
(1) A = B, D = C, F = E, B = A, AB/AD = BC/BE
(2) A = D, AB/EF = BC/DE
(3) AB perp CD, DE perp AE, AB = DE and BC = BD
(4) AB parallel to BC, AB parallel to AC, CA parallel to FD
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The analysis by @CPhill in part (2) is incorrect and his conclusion
for this part is incorrect, too.
Indeed, one condition, A = D, does relate to angles A and D.
The second condition, AB/EF = BC/DE, can be equivalently rewritten in the form
AB/BC = EF/DE,
and this form tells us that this proportion relates to the sides concluding angles
B in triangle ABC and E in triangle DEF.
In any case, this proportion is not applicable to congruent angles A and D,
so, WE CAN NOT CONCLUDE that triangles ABC and DEF are similar: we have no BASE
to make such a conclusion.
So, again, in part (2), the analysis and the conclusion by @CPhill are incorrect.
------------------------------------
My conclusion after consideration of solution by @CPhill is as follows:
(a) too many words and irrelevant reasoning that confuse the reader;
(b) absence of the correct firm general idea/conception.
My evaluation of the work by @CPhill (same as his version of " Artificial intelligence ")
in the scale " acceptable - unacceptable " :
*****************************************************
Unacceptable
*****************************************************