SOLUTION: A student tried to trisect an angle G using the following procedure: 1. Mark off GA congruent to GB. 2. Draw AB 3. Divide AB into 3 congruent parts so that AX=XY=YB. 4. Draw GX

Question 1182025: A student tried to trisect an angle G using the following procedure:
1. Mark off GA congruent to GB.
2. Draw AB
3. Divide AB into 3 congruent parts so that AX=XY=YB.
4. Draw GX and GY.
Show that the student did not trisect angle G (Hint: Show that GA>GY. Then use indirect proof to show that m I know how to show that GA>GY (by SAS Inequality) but cannot show why m
Answer by CPhill(1959) (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
You're asking to prove that a student's method for trisecting an angle doesn't actually work. Here's a breakdown of the proof:
**1. Definitions and Setup**
* We're given that GA is congruent to GB, and AX = XY = YB. This means AY = (2/3)AB.
* We want to show that angle AGX, angle XGY, and angle YGB are *not* all equal.
**2. Showing GA > GY**
* Consider triangle GAY. By the triangle inequality theorem, the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. Therefore, GA + AY > GY.
* We know GA = GB. Since AX = XY = YB, Y lies between A and B, making AY < AB. So AY = (2/3)AB < AB.
* Now, assume, for the sake of contradiction, that GA <= GY. Since GA + AY > GY, then GY + AY > GY, which means AY > 0 (always true).
* However, if we assume GA = GY, then triangle GAY is isosceles. Since A, X, and Y are collinear, this would imply that GX is the angle bisector of angle AGY. In triangle GAB, since GA = GB, the median from G to AB will bisect angle AGB. Since GX is not a median, GX is not the angle bisector. Therefore, GA != GY.
* Since GA != GY and GA + AY > GY, then GA > GY.
**3. Indirect Proof**
* **Assumption:** Let's assume, for the sake of contradiction, that the student's method *does* trisect the angle. This means ∠AGX = ∠XGY = ∠YGB.
* **Consequence of the Assumption:** If the angles are equal, and we know GA = GB and AX = XY = YB, then by the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence theorem, triangles GAX and GYX would be congruent. This would imply that GX = GY.
* **Contradiction:** But we've already proven that GA > GY. If GX = GY, then we would also have GA = GY, which contradicts our earlier finding.
* **Conclusion:** Our initial assumption that the angles are equal must be false. Therefore, the student's method does *not* trisect the angle.
**In simpler terms:** The student's construction makes it look like the angle is trisected, but it's a visual trick. The side GY is shorter than GA, which prevents the equal angles from being created.

RELATED QUESTIONS
A student tried to trisect an angle G using the following procedure: 1. Mark off GA... (answered by Edwin McCravy)

A student tried to trisect an angle G using the following procedure: 1. Mark off GA... (answered by CPhill,Edwin McCravy)

The segments GA and GB are tangent to a circle at A and B, and AGB is a 48-degree angle.... (answered by ankor@dixie-net.com)

The segments GA and GB are tangent to a circle at A and B, and AGB is a 60-degree angle. (answered by greenestamps)

10. The segments GA and GB are tangent to a circle with center O at A and B, and AGB is a (answered by jim_thompson5910)

given angle 1 is congruent to angle 2 prove angle 3 is congruent to angle 4 and ab = de... (answered by fractalier)

given: AB is parallel to CB, AB is parallel to CD prove:angle 1 is congruent to angle... (answered by jim_thompson5910)

(answered by KMST)
Segment BC is congruent to segment DC angle A is congruent to angle E angle 1 is... (answered by ikleyn)