SOLUTION: "What is the counterexample for: The repeating decimals are closed under subtraction.

Algebra.Com
Question 508309: "What is the counterexample for: The repeating decimals are closed under subtraction.
Answer by richard1234(7193)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
If we consider 4 as a non-repeating decimal (as opposed to 4.0000...) then we can say that the equation 4.333... - .333... = 4 is a counterexample.
RELATED QUESTIONS

My question is " the set of whole numbers is closed under subtraction. if false, give a... (answered by jim_thompson5910)
The negative number integers are closed under subtraction. (answered by jim_thompson5910)
What set is closed under... (answered by fractalier)
what type of number is closed under subtraction? prime numbers (answered by solver91311)
Show that the integers not divisible by 3 are not closed under... (answered by richard1234)
Please help me solve this question: Determine whether each statement is true or false... (answered by Fombitz)
Find a counterexample to disprove the statement "the associative property is true for... (answered by richard1234)
Is the following true or false? The set of whole numbers is closed under subtraction... (answered by askmemath)
The set of integers is NOT closed under which operation? a. Multiplication b. (answered by checkley71)