SOLUTION: I dont have a clue! Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. * Valid by the law of detac

Algebra ->  Algebra  -> Conjunction -> SOLUTION: I dont have a clue! Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. * Valid by the law of detac      Log On

 Ad: Algebrator™ solves your algebra problems and provides step-by-step explanations! Ad: Algebra Solved!™: algebra software solves algebra homework problems with step-by-step help!

 Logic: Propositions, Conjunction, Disjunction, Implication Solvers Lessons Answers archive Quiz In Depth

 Click here to see ALL problems on Conjunction Question 309832: I dont have a clue! Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. * Valid by the law of detachment * Valid by the law of contraposition *Invalid by fallacy of the converse * Invalid by fallacy of the inverse * Valid by the law of syllogism * Valid by disjunctive syllogism Any help would be greatly apprecitated!Answer by stanbon(57219)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. * Valid by the law of detachment * Valid by the law of contraposition *Invalid by fallacy of the converse * Invalid by fallacy of the inverse * Valid by the law of syllogism * Valid by disjunctive syllogism ====================================== Something you need to know. If "p implies q" is true, the converse "not q implies not p" is a false conclusion. --- The argument above is invalid by fallacy of the converse. ======================== Cheers, Stan H.