SOLUTION: are they logically equivalent ~pVq; p-->q

Algebra.Com
Question 1109186: are they logically equivalent ~pVq; p-->q
Answer by math_helper(2461)   (Show Source): You can put this solution on YOUR website!
Make a truth table for each, and then compare:

 p     q        ~pVq       p—>q
 —     —-       ———-       ———  
 F     F          T           T
 F     T          T           T
 T     F          F           F
 T     T          T           T

—
Looks the same to me.


RELATED QUESTIONS

please help me by showing the proof of the following using the rules of... (answered by robertb)
Show that if(~Pv~Q)then (~P&~Q) is equivalent to if (PvQ) then... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
I know that these two conjuncts are equivelant, but I do not know how to solve/show this! (answered by jim_thompson5910)
problem 1f: -(PvQ) -||-... (answered by vleith)
P ∙ (Q ⊃ R) ; (P ∙ Q) ⊃ (P ∙ R) are logically equivalent... (answered by jim_thompson5910)
Determine if the two statements are logically equivalent, negations, or neither. (p... (answered by jim_thompson5910)
how to expand... (answered by Edwin McCravy)
If p.q are two statements then pv(p^q)=? ans.... (answered by stanbon)
Today I asked my Professor in my Logic class if I could do this. 1. ~P 2. ~(PvQ)>~R... (answered by jim_thompson5910)